These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3958662)

  • 21. Expectancies of reinforcer location and quality as cues for a conditional discrimination in pigeons.
    Williams DA; Butler MM; Overmier JB
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jan; 16(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 2303792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies?
    Nevin JA; Tota ME; Torquato RD; Shull RL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 May; 53(3):359-79. PubMed ID: 2341820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An automated apparatus for the study of visual discriminations in pigeons.
    Giachetti P; Orsini C; Fogassi L; Francesconi W; Musumeci D
    Behav Brain Res; 1985 May; 15(3):255-8. PubMed ID: 4005033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of stimulus similarity in discrimination training upon wavelength generalization in pigeons.
    Tomie A; Davitt GA; Thomas DR
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1975 Feb; 88(2):945-54. PubMed ID: 1150957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Expectancy mediation of concurrent conditional discriminations.
    Peterson GB; Trapold MA
    Am J Psychol; 1982; 95(4):571-80. PubMed ID: 7168456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Generalization and response mediation of a conditional discrimination.
    Eckerman DA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1970 May; 13(3):301-16. PubMed ID: 5483825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Shared attention in pigeons.
    Maki WS; Leith CR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Mar; 19(2):345-9. PubMed ID: 4706238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Selective attention and pigeons' multiple necessary cues discrimination learning.
    Teng Y; Vyazovska OV; Wasserman EA
    Behav Processes; 2015 Mar; 112():61-71. PubMed ID: 25150067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of chlorpromazine on fixed-ratio responding: modification by fixed-interval discriminative stimuli.
    Witkin JM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Mar; 45(2):195-205. PubMed ID: 3958665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Range effects in successive discrimination.
    Hinson JM; Lockhead GR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1986 Jul; 12(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 3734695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Discrimination of temporal relations by pigeons.
    Dreyfus LR; Fetterman JG; Smith LD; Stubbs DA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1988 Oct; 14(4):349-67. PubMed ID: 3183576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Further evidence of a sensory-tonic interaction in pigeons.
    Thomas DR; Lyons J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Mar; 11(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 5645873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Imitative learning of stimulus-response and response-outcome associations in pigeons.
    Saggerson AL; George DN; Honey RC
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Jul; 31(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 16045384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A three-stimulus midsession reversal task in pigeons with visual and spatial discriminative stimuli.
    McMillan N; Roberts WA
    Anim Cogn; 2015 Jan; 18(1):373-83. PubMed ID: 25227939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multiple feature use in pigeons' category discrimination: The influence of stimulus set structure and the salience of stimulus differences.
    Lea SEG; Pothos EM; Wills AJ; Leaver LA; Ryan CME; Meier C
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(2):114-127. PubMed ID: 29683693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: I. Unidimensional classification does not necessarily imply analytic processing; evidence from pigeons (Columba livia), squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Wills AJ; Lea SE; Leaver LA; Osthaus B; Ryan CM; Suret MB; Bryant CM; Chapman SJ; Millar L
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Nov; 123(4):391-405. PubMed ID: 19929108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of cocaine and d-amphetamine on the repeated acquisition and performance of conditional discriminations.
    Moerschbaecher JM; Boren JJ; Schrot J; Fontes JC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Jan; 31(1):127-40. PubMed ID: 429956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. On the failure and facilitation of conditional discrimination.
    Williams BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Nov; 38(3):265-80. PubMed ID: 7175428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Auditory word discriminations in the pigeon.
    Pisacreta R; Gough D; Redwood E; Goodfellow L
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 May; 45(3):269-82. PubMed ID: 3711775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Conditioned reinforcement value and choice.
    Preston RA; Fantino E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Mar; 55(2):155-75. PubMed ID: 2037825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.