These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3958995)

  • 21. The use of tactile supplements in lipreading Swedish and English: a single-subject study.
    Plant G; Gnosspelius J; Levitt H
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Feb; 43(1):172-83. PubMed ID: 10668660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Tactile perception of various suprasegmental characteristics of speech as compared to lipreading].
    Prosser S; Arslan E; Trevisi P; Zecchini B
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1987; 7(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 3455092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of tactile aids.
    Summers I
    Br J Audiol; 1989 Aug; 23(3):267-9. PubMed ID: 2790314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Laboratory projects in tactile aids to lipreading.
    De Filippo CL
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(4):211-27. PubMed ID: 6468779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Speech teaching for deaf children in the age of bilingual/bicultural programs: the role of tactile aids.
    Plant G; Horan M; Reed H
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1997; 47():19-23. PubMed ID: 9428039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A pilot experiment on the effects of an acoustically applied reduced speech signal on speechreading.
    Coninx F; Vermuelen A; Zierhofer C
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():136-44. PubMed ID: 8153559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of two multichannel tactile devices as supplements to speechreading in a postlingually deafened adult.
    Waldstein RS; Boothroyd A
    Ear Hear; 1995 Apr; 16(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 7789671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Visual and tactile recognition of words of various lengths and lexical occurrence].
    Prosser S; Trevisi P; Arslan E
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1988; 8(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 2973204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual and tactual perception of syllable number in sentence stimuli.
    Bourgeois MS; Goldstein H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jan; 73(1):367-71. PubMed ID: 6219145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Microprocessor-based hearing aid for the deaf.
    Shimizu Y
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1989; 26(2):25-36. PubMed ID: 2724150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Integration of visual and tactile modalities.
    Summers IR; Du J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1997; 47():29-33. PubMed ID: 9428041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of multichannel tactile aids and multichannel cochlear implants in children with profound hearing impairments.
    Miyamoto RT; Robbins AM; Osberger MJ; Todd SL; Riley AI; Kirk KI
    Am J Otol; 1995 Jan; 16(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 8579182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Perception of frequency contours via temporal and spatial tactile transforms.
    Hnath-Chisolm T; Medwetsky L
    Ear Hear; 1988 Dec; 9(6):322-8. PubMed ID: 3220184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of two training strategies for speech recognition with an electrotactile speech processor.
    Alcantara JI; Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):195-204. PubMed ID: 2138238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Lipreading sentences with vibrotactile vocoders: performance of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Bernstein LE; Demorest ME; Coulter DC; O'Connell MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Dec; 90(6):2971-84. PubMed ID: 1838561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Investigating the MESA (multipoint electrotactile speech aid): the transmission of connected discourse.
    Sparks DW; Ardell LA; Bourgeois M; Wiedmer B; Kuhl PK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Mar; 65(3):810-5. PubMed ID: 447911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The use of visual and tactile sensory aids in speech production training: a preliminary report.
    McGarr NS; Head J; Friedman M; Behrman AM; Youdelman K
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Jan; 23(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 2420983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Temporal and spatio-temporal vibrotactile displays for voice fundamental frequency: an initial evaluation of a new vibrotactile speech perception aid with normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals.
    Auer ET; Bernstein LE; Coulter DC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2477-89. PubMed ID: 10491709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Within-subject comparison of speech perception benefits with a multiple-channel cochlear implant and a tactile device.
    Sarant JZ; Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Galvin KL; Clark GM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():339-41. PubMed ID: 7668697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.