These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3959000)

  • 1. Inductive coupling of hearing aids and telephone receivers.
    Stoker RG; French-St George M; Lyons JM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Jan; 23(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 3959000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory steady-state responses and word recognition scores in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults.
    Dimitrijevic A; John MS; Picton TW
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):68-84. PubMed ID: 14770019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Telephone listening ability for hearing-impaired individuals.
    Holmes AE; Frank T
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 6724177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of fitting formulas in programmable hearing aids on speech discrimination in noise.
    Dündar SE; Aksoy S
    Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2007; 17(5):278-82. PubMed ID: 18187987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
    Smits C; Kramer SE; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Telecoil-mode hearing aid compatibility performance requirements for wireless and cordless handsets: magnetic signal levels.
    Julstrom S; Kozma-Spytek L; Isabelle S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Sep; 22(8):515-27. PubMed ID: 22031676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech discrimination and effectiveness of hearing aids under listening conditions similar to those of a transit operator.
    Lee LA; Chung DY; Gannon RP
    J Otolaryngol; 1981 Jun; 10(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 7277564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.
    Boothroyd A
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of digital labeling on outcome measures.
    Bentler RA; Niebuhr DP; Johnson TA; Flamme GA
    Ear Hear; 2003 Jun; 24(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12799543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers.
    Narendran MM; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance characteristics for hearing aid microphone versus telephone and telephone/telecoil reception modes.
    Tannahill JC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Jun; 26(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 6887805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
    Summers V; Cord MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An influence of binaural hearing aids on positioning of sound images.
    Nábĕlek AK; Letowski T; Mason D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1980 Sep; 23(3):670-87. PubMed ID: 7421165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early clinical results: SOUNDTEC implantable hearing device phase II study.
    Hough JV; Dyer RK; Matthews P; Wood MW
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Jan; 111(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11192875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acclimatization in first-time hearing aid users using three different fitting protocols.
    Reber MB; Kompis M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2005 Dec; 32(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 16039083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.