201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3959161)
1. Comparative electron microscopic study of bovine, porcine and human parietal pericardium, as materials for cardiac valve bioprostheses.
Fentie IH; Allen DJ; Schenck MH; Didio LJ
J Submicrosc Cytol; 1986 Jan; 18(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 3959161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microscopic study of normal parietal pericardium and unimplanted Puig-Zerbini pericardial valvular heterografts.
Allen DJ; DiDio LJ; Zacharias A; Fentie I; McGrath AJ; Puig LB; Pomerantzeff PN; Zerbini EJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Jun; 87(6):845-55. PubMed ID: 6727408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Structure of bovine parietal pericardium and of unimplanted Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valvular bioprostheses.
Ishihara T; Ferrans VJ; Jones M; Boyce SW; Roberts WC
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1981 May; 81(5):747-57. PubMed ID: 7218840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative assessment of hepatic Glisson's capsule and bovine pericardium in heart valve bioprostheses.
Kagramanov II; Kokshenev IV; Dobrova NB; Kastava VT; Serov RA; Zaets SB
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 9651839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ionescu-Shiley bovine pericardial bioprostheses. Histologic and ultrastructural studies.
Hilbert SL; Ferrans VJ; McAllister HA; Cooley DA
Am J Pathol; 1992 May; 140(5):1195-204. PubMed ID: 1580331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study of bovine and porcine pericardium to highlight their potential advantages to manufacture percutaneous cardiovascular implants.
Gauvin R; Marinov G; Mehri Y; Klein J; Li B; Larouche D; Guzman R; Zhang Z; Germain L; Guidoin R
J Biomater Appl; 2013 Nov; 28(4):552-65. PubMed ID: 23142967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro calcification of pericardial bioprostheses.
Glasmacher B; Reul H; Schneppershoff S; Schreck S; Rau G
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Jul; 7(4):415-8. PubMed ID: 9697064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the compressive buckling of porcine aortic valve cusps and bovine pericardium.
Vesely I; Mako WJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Jan; 7(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 9502137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preparation and characterization of an acellular bovine pericardium intended for manufacture of valve bioprostheses.
Goissis G; Giglioti Ade F; Braile DM
Artif Organs; 2011 May; 35(5):484-9. PubMed ID: 21595716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. St Jude Epic heart valve bioprostheses versus native human and porcine aortic valves - comparison of mechanical properties.
Kalejs M; Stradins P; Lacis R; Ozolanta I; Pavars J; Kasyanov V
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 8(5):553-6. PubMed ID: 19190025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of fixation back pressure and antimineralization treatment on the morphology of porcine aortic bioprosthetic valves.
Flomenbaum MA; Schoen FJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Jan; 105(1):154-64. PubMed ID: 8419696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial.
Chaudhry MA; Raco L; Muriithi EW; Bernacca GM; Tolland MM; Wheatley DJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8. PubMed ID: 10888102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anisotropic elasticity and strength of glutaraldehyde fixed bovine pericardium for use in pericardial bioprosthetic valves.
Zioupos P; Barbenel JC; Fisher J
J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Jan; 28(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 8126028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of tensile properties of xenopericardium from three animal species and finite element analysis for bioprosthetic heart valve tissue.
Rassoli A; Fatouraee N; Guidoin R; Zhang Z
Artif Organs; 2020 Mar; 44(3):278-287. PubMed ID: 31386771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lyophilized bovine pericardium treated with a phenethylamine-diepoxide as an alternative to preventing calcification of cardiovascular bioprosthesis: preliminary calcification results.
Aimoli CG; Nogueira GM; Nascimento LS; Baceti A; Leirner AA; Maizato MJ; Higa OZ; Polakiewicz B; Pitombo RN; Beppu MM
Artif Organs; 2007 Apr; 31(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 17437496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison on the properties of bovine pericardium and porcine pericardium used as leaflet materials of transcatheter heart valve.
Jin C; Zhao L; Wu Z; Li B; Liu R; He H; Wang L; Wang W
Artif Organs; 2022 Mar; 46(3):427-438. PubMed ID: 34545589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pathologic findings in explanted clinical bioprosthetic valves fabricated from photooxidized bovine pericardium.
Schoen FJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Mar; 7(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 9587858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Holographic interferometry and in vitro calcification: comparing pericardial versus porcine bioprostheses.
Deiwick M; Glasmacher B; Tjan DT; Reul H; von Bally G; Scheld HH
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Jul; 7(4):419-27. PubMed ID: 9697065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Calcification of porcine bioprosthesis implanted into human heart: high resolution scanning electron microscopic and scanning tunneling microscopic investigation.
Lee YS
J Electron Microsc (Tokyo); 1994 Jun; 43(3):131-40. PubMed ID: 7964262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
