These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3960430)

  • 1. Improved outcome of twice weekly nonstress testing.
    Boehm FH; Salyer S; Shah DM; Vaughn WK
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Apr; 67(4):566-8. PubMed ID: 3960430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Continuing role of the nonstress test in the management of postdates pregnancy.
    Phelan JP; Platt LD; Yeh SY; Trujillo M; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Nov; 64(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 6493655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonstress testing and perinatal outcome.
    Rayburn W; Greene J; Donaldson M
    J Reprod Med; 1980 May; 24(5):191-6. PubMed ID: 7401050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The nonstress test. A preliminary report of a graded classification.
    O'Leary JA; Mendenhall HW; Andrinopoulos GC
    J Reprod Med; 1980 Nov; 25(5):251-5. PubMed ID: 7452634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A prospective trial of the fetal biophysical profile versus the nonstress test in the management of high-risk pregnancies.
    Platt LD; Walla CA; Paul RH; Trujillo ME; Loesser CV; Jacobs ND; Broussard PM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 153(6):624-33. PubMed ID: 4061530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stillbirth after nonstress testing.
    Barss VA; Frigoletto FD; Diamond F
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Apr; 65(4):541-4. PubMed ID: 3982728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A review of the nonstress test.
    Knuppel RA; Lake M; Ingram JM
    J Reprod Med; 1982 Mar; 27(3):120-6. PubMed ID: 7086760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study of stressed and nonstressed antepartum fetal heart rate testing.
    Keane MW; Horger EO; Vice L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Mar; 57(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 7465146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The nonstress test: the value of a single acceleration in evaluating the fetus at risk.
    Mendenhall HW; O'Leary JA; Phillips KO
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Jan; 136(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 7352492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prognostic components of the nonreactive nonstress test.
    Ingardia CJ; Cetrulo CL; Knuppel RA; Kappy KA; Scerbo JC; Lake M; Aumann G
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep; 56(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 7422169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Further experience with the fetal biophysical profile.
    Platt LD; Eglinton GS; Sipos L; Broussard PM; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Apr; 61(4):480-5. PubMed ID: 6681892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intrauterine fetal death in twins after 32 weeks of gestation.
    Knuppel RA; Rattan PK; Scerbo JC; O'Brien WF
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Feb; 65(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 3969231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonstress and contraction stress fetal heart rate monitoring. A randomized trial to determine which is the faster primary test.
    Newnham JP; Burns SE; Szczygielski C; Roberman B
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Apr; 33(4):356-60. PubMed ID: 3367336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Antepartum fetal heart rate testing in preterm pregnancy.
    Devoe LD
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Oct; 60(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 7121929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fetal stress and nonstress tests: an analysis and comparison of their ability to identify fetal outcome.
    Pratt D; Diamond F; Yen H; Bieniarz J; Burd L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Oct; 54(4):419-23. PubMed ID: 492619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonstress testing in a physician's office--a five-year experience.
    Hill WC; Alderson M; Henderson T
    West J Med; 1985 Nov; 143(5):633-5. PubMed ID: 4082570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An assessment of the first decade's experience with antepartum fetal heart rate testing.
    Schneider EP; Hutson JM; Petrie RH
    Am J Perinatol; 1988 Apr; 5(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 3348858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The evaluation of antepartum fetal well-being using the nonstress test.
    Paul RH
    Clin Perinatol; 1982 Jun; 9(2):253-63. PubMed ID: 6749370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification, assessment and management of fetal compromise.
    Walton JR; Peaceman AM
    Clin Perinatol; 2012 Dec; 39(4):753-68. PubMed ID: 23164176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Monitoring of high-risk pregnancies. Complementary aspects of the nonstress test, the oxytocin test and the biophysical score].
    Beco J; Lambotte R
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1986; 15(8):997-1008. PubMed ID: 3546475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.