These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3960430)
21. Comparison of the manual stimulation test and the nonstress test: a randomized controlled trial. Piyamongkol W; Trungtawatchai S; Chanprapaph P; Tongsong T J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Dec; 89(12):1999-2002. PubMed ID: 17214048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. NST vs CST: the nonstress test in high risk pregnancies. Cederlind CJ J Kans Med Soc; 1980 Feb; 81(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 7351510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of nonstress fetal heart rate testing in multiple gestations. Blake GD; Knuppel RA; Ingardia CJ; Lake M; Aumann G; Hanson M Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Apr; 63(4):528-32. PubMed ID: 6700901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Nonstress test. Kopf R Am J Nurs; 1978 Dec; 78(12):2115-7. PubMed ID: 251412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile. Nageotte MP; Towers CV; Asrat T; Freeman RK Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1672-6. PubMed ID: 8203424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fetal surveillance. Should it begin at 40 weeks' gestation in a low-risk population? Rosen DJ; Michaeli G; Markov S; Greenspoon JS; Goldberger SB; Fejgin MD J Reprod Med; 1995 Feb; 40(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 7738924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Antepartum fetal surveillance. Nonstress test, contraction stress test, and biophysical profile. Babbitt NE S D J Med; 1996 Nov; 49(11):403-8. PubMed ID: 8973133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of auditory versus electronic assessment of antenatal fetal welfare. O'Leary JA; Mendenhall HW; Andrinopoulos GC Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 56(2):244-6. PubMed ID: 7393517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Correlation of nonstressed fetal heart rate with sequential contraction stress test. Gibbons JM; Nagle P Obstet Gynecol; 1980 May; 55(5):612-6. PubMed ID: 7366920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of urinary estrogens, contraction stress tests and nonstress tests in the management of postterm pregnancy. Khouzami VA; Johnson JW; Daikoku NH; Rotmensch J; Hernandez E J Reprod Med; 1983 Mar; 28(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 6854549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Contraction stress test by intermittent nipple stimulation. Huddleston JF; Sutliff G; Robinson D Obstet Gynecol; 1984 May; 63(5):669-73. PubMed ID: 6717870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reliability of antenatal testing: estriol levels versus nonstress testing. Lauersen NH; Kurkulos M; Graves ZR; Lewin K Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jul; 62(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 6856212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The uses and limitations of the fetal biophysical profile. Oyelese Y; Vintzileos AM Clin Perinatol; 2011 Mar; 38(1):47-64, v-vi. PubMed ID: 21353089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A new modality in nonstress testing: evaluation of beat-to-beat fetal heart rate variability. Lauersen NH; Wilson KH; Bilek A; Rao VS; Kurkulos M Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Nov; 141(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 7294079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The nonstress test: a review of 3,000 tests. Phelan JP Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Jan; 139(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 7457525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Management of a nonreactive nonstress test in a twin gestation. A case report. Newton ER; Genest DR; Cetrulo CL J Reprod Med; 1983 May; 28(5):345-8. PubMed ID: 6152990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]