These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. Paper work can be at the heart of some of radiology's problems! Skidmore K Hosp Top; 1981; 59(2):36-9. PubMed ID: 10250662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Authentication and management of radiologic reports: value of a computer workstation integrated with a radiology information system. Frank MS; Rowberg AH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Dec; 161(6):1309-11. PubMed ID: 8249749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A mathematical model to determine facility needs for a radiology department. Simendinger EA; Tuzi LA; Moore TF Hosp Eng; 1978; 32(1):14-8, 21-6. PubMed ID: 10308684 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Total digital radiology: is it feasible? Or desirable? Gray JE; Karsell PR; Becker GP; Gehring DG AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Dec; 143(6):1345-9. PubMed ID: 6333802 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. A new approach to RIS/DR interconnection. Hayes B Radiol Manage; 1999; 21(2):44-7. PubMed ID: 10351742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Effective use of a computer in radiology. Miller J Appl Radiol; 1982; 11(2):53-4, 56-7. PubMed ID: 10254699 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Medical records: speeding up the system. Prees M Health Soc Serv J; 1980 Sep; 90(4711):1235-7. PubMed ID: 10248526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Success with voice recognition. Sferrella SM Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(3):42-9. PubMed ID: 12817421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The use of psychophysical principles in the design of a total digital radiology department. Seeley GW; Newell JD Radiol Clin North Am; 1985 Jun; 23(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 3991891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Cost sensitivity analysis for radiology department planning. Sullivan WG; Thuesen GJ Health Serv Res; 1971; 6(4):337-49. PubMed ID: 5133836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Software for the personal computer. Monthly productivity reporting. Rubenzer BF Radiol Manage; 1986 Jan; 8(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 10278382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Overview of word processing. Mahoney RJ Radiol Manage; 1981 Jun; 3(3):19-22. PubMed ID: 10252072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. [The influence of radiology departments in the problems of records from Paris and the Paris area]. Sauvegrain J J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1977; 58(8-9):555-7. PubMed ID: 592276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. A computer system to monitor radiology department activity: a management tool to improve patient care. Jost RG; Rodewald SS; Hill RL; Evens RG Radiology; 1982 Nov; 145(2):347-50. PubMed ID: 7134433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Automation of the radiology management function. Arenson RL Radiology; 1984 Oct; 153(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 6473803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Radiology information system--let's phase it. Hanwell L; Hartman P Radiol Manage; 1982 Sep; 4(4):2-7. PubMed ID: 10309800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]