These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3961145)

  • 41. [The new X-ray regulation].
    Roos G
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1988 May; 113(19):793-4. PubMed ID: 3366081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Quality assurance in diagnostic radiology using an automated system. Experience and results].
    Princivalli M; Stea L; Ordóñez PL; Bussoli L; Marchetti C
    Radiol Med; 1995 May; 89(5):667-74. PubMed ID: 7617909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Diagnostic quality criteria for x-ray examinations].
    Stender HS
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1986; 27(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 3961136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Quality control under conditions of a standardized x-ray photographic technic].
    Liess G; Brandt GA; Stargardt A
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1985; 123():132-7. PubMed ID: 2860856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [X-ray examinations in Norway--optimized use of radiation and radiation protection].
    Olerud HM
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Apr; 119(9):1322-5. PubMed ID: 10327857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Indications for medical radiation procedures and the possibility of limiting values for radiation exposure of patients].
    Stopp G
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1984; 25(4):451-60. PubMed ID: 6385098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography--image quality and radiation dose.
    Ng KH; Jamal N; DeWerd L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 16709704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Assessment of mammographic units in Poland in the view of current requirements of radiation protection regulations].
    Bekas M; Pachocki KA; Rózycki Z; Wieprzowski K; Fabiszewska E
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2006; 57(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 16900867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Dose and quality control (DQC) in diagnostic radiology.
    Holloway AF; Taylor KW; Hobbs BB
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Jun; 35(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 6480667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Calculation of the estimated collective effective dose equivalent (SE) due to x-ray diagnostic examinations--estimate of the SE in Finland.
    Rannikko S; Servomaa A; Ermakov I; Masarskii L; Saltukova L; Razumnaya M; Nikitin V
    Health Phys; 1987 Jul; 53(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 3597096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Individual monitoring for internal exposure in Europe and the integration of dosimetric data.
    Lopez Ponte MA; Castellani CM; Currivan L; Falk R; Olko P; Wernli C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 112(1):69-119. PubMed ID: 15574987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Normalized organ doses and effective doses to a reference Indian adult male in conventional medical diagnostic x-ray examinations.
    Biju K; Nagarajan PS
    Health Phys; 2006 Mar; 90(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 16505618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Responsibilities of the authorities and officially designated inspectors including surveillance (the new x-ray ordinance)].
    Raum H
    Rontgenblatter; 1988 Nov; 41(11):447-8. PubMed ID: 3194682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 5: organ doses in chest radiography].
    Seidenbusch MC; Schneider K
    Rofo; 2009 May; 181(5):454-71. PubMed ID: 19391068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Quality assurance in dental radiography: intra-oral image quality analysis.
    Bolas A; Fitzgerald M
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2008 Dec-2009 Jan; 54(6):274-8. PubMed ID: 19189748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
    Sniureviciute M; Adliene D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Establishment of the conversion factors for determining organ doses and absorbed energy in patients during x-ray diagnostic studies].
    Gosch D; Gursky S; Wimmler F
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1989; 30(3):345-9. PubMed ID: 2798825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Radiation doses from some common paediatric X-ray examinations in Sudan.
    Suliman II; Elshiekh EH
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 18765402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Increasing film-focus distance (FFD) reduces radiation dose for x-ray examinations.
    Brennan PC; McDonnell S; O'Leary D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 108(3):263-8. PubMed ID: 15031448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [The x-ray ordinance of January 8, 1987].
    Stieve FE
    Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1988; 30():181-98. PubMed ID: 3222797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.