These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3961193)
21. Noncompliance with guidelines for intravascular use of lower-osmolality contrast media. Damiani DR; Swanson DP; Hanwell LL Am J Hosp Pharm; 1993 Jun; 50(6):1204-6. PubMed ID: 8517462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. In vitro study of high-pressure catheters and various contrast agents. Rees CR; Merchun G; Becker GJ; Klatte EC; Mail JT; Mulry C Radiology; 1988 Jan; 166(1 Pt 1):53-6. PubMed ID: 3336701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Modification of the image quality of i.v. DSA by the iodine concentration of the contrast medium]. Langer M; Felix R; Keysser R; Speck U; Banzer D Digitale Bilddiagn; 1985 Sep; 5(3):154-9. PubMed ID: 3902326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison of nonionic, low-osmolality radiocontrast agents with ionic, high-osmolality agents during cardiac catheterization. Barrett BJ; Parfrey PS; Vavasour HM; O'Dea F; Kent G; Stone E N Engl J Med; 1992 Feb; 326(7):431-6. PubMed ID: 1732770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Advantages of non-ionic contrast media in vascular applications. Malott JC; Fodor J Radiol Technol; 1984; 56(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 6390518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Nonionic low-osmolality versus ionic high-osmolality contrast material for intravenous use in patients perceived to be at high risk: randomized trial. Barrett BJ; Parfrey PS; McDonald JR; Hefferton DM; Reddy ER; McManamon PJ Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 1549654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Iodine delivery rate in catheter angiography under pressure conditions in manual injection]. Busch HP; Stocker KP Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 Sep; 8(5):232-5. PubMed ID: 9799946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Compact dimers: new hexaiodinated nonionic dimers with isosmolality to blood and low viscosity at 350 mg I/ml. Meyer D; Bourguine G; Petta M Acad Radiol; 1996 Aug; 3 Suppl 2():S218-9. PubMed ID: 8796566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Intravascular contrast media. Ionic versus nonionic: current status. McClennan BL; Stolberg HO Radiol Clin North Am; 1991 May; 29(3):437-54. PubMed ID: 2023999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Variable effects of radiological contrast media on thrombus growth in a rabbit jugular vein thrombosis model. Levi M; Biemond BJ; Sturk A; Hoek J; ten Cate JW Thromb Haemost; 1991 Aug; 66(2):218-21. PubMed ID: 1771615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Osmotic properties of some contrast media. Bordalen BE; Wang H; Holtermann H Invest Radiol; 1970; 5(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 5501856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The cardiovascular effects of iodinated contrast media injections. Morris TW Invest Radiol; 1988 Sep; 23 Suppl 1():S133-6. PubMed ID: 3198332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Hydrosoluble contrast media. Criteria for a choice]. Larroque CH; Esquirol E; Champagne de Labriolle A Rev Corps Sante Armees Terre Mer Air; 1972 Jun; 13(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 4263547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. A case study of the decision in Denmark to restrict use of high-osmolar contrast media in intravascular radiographic procedures. Thomsen HS; Archer JW; Schiermer L; Radensky PW Acad Radiol; 1997 Jun; 4(6):446-50. PubMed ID: 9189203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The financial impact of Denmark's decision to restrict the use of high-osmolar contrast media in intravascular radiographic procedures. Thomsen HS; Archer JW; Schiermer L; Radensky PW Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(2):321-2. PubMed ID: 9477291 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Plasma osmolarity, iodine concentration and urographic images. Lord P Clin Radiol; 1991 Nov; 44(5):363-4. PubMed ID: 1760919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]