These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3963141)

  • 1. Comparison of subjective lens preference to objective refractive error measurements in pigtail macaques.
    Wesner MF; Young FA
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1986 Mar; 63(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 3963141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Objective and subjective refractive error measurements in monkeys.
    Hung LF; Ramamirtham R; Wensveen JM; Harwerth RS; Smith EL
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Feb; 89(2):168-77. PubMed ID: 22198796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subjective refraction of the peripheral field using contrast detection acuity.
    Wang YZ; Thibos LN; Lopez N; Salmon T; Bradley A
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):584-9. PubMed ID: 8942130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating Self-Refraction and Ready-Made Spectacles for Treatment of Uncorrected Refractive Error.
    Camp AS; Shane TS; Kang J; Thomas B; Pole C; Lee RK
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2018; 25(5-6):392-398. PubMed ID: 30118609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid?
    Kimura S; Hasebe S; Ohtsuki H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17470241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Incidence of refractive errors with corrective aids subsequent selection].
    Benes P; Synek S; Petrová S; Sokolová SJ; Forýtková L; Holoubková Z
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2012 Feb; 68(1):11-4, 16. PubMed ID: 22679692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Eye and eyeglasses].
    Reiner J
    Buch Augenarzt; 1972; 59():1-132. PubMed ID: 5063498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An alternative clinical routine for subjective refraction based on power vectors with trial frames.
    María Revert A; Conversa MA; Albarrán Diego C; Micó V
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jan; 37(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 28030877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alternative methods of refraction: a comparison of three techniques.
    Smith K; Weissberg E; Travison TG
    Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Mar; 87(3):E176-82. PubMed ID: 20081549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast (modulation) sensitivity functions measured in patients with high refractive error with emphasis on aphakia: I. Theoretical considerations.
    Enoch JM; Ohzu H; Itoi M
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1979 Sep; 47(1):139-45. PubMed ID: 520138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-assessment of refractive errors using a simple optical approach.
    Leube A; Kraft C; Ohlendorf A; Wahl S
    Clin Exp Optom; 2018 May; 101(3):386-391. PubMed ID: 29356102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Subjective determination of ocular refraction. I: Optical principles].
    Friedburg D; Krause K
    Ophthalmologe; 2002 Jul; 99(7):586-93; quiz 594-7. PubMed ID: 12148309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Comparison Between Refraction From an Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator and Clinical Refractions.
    Tabernero J; Otero C; Pardhan S
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Jun; 9(7):23. PubMed ID: 32832229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the Visual Acuity and Refractive Error Using OPDIII and Subjective Findings in Visually Normal Subjects.
    Alamdar M; Jafarzadehpur E; Mirzajani A; Yekta AA; Khabazkhoob M
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Nov; 44 Suppl 2():S302-S306. PubMed ID: 30379733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Refractive status in eyes with inhomogeneous or irregular pupils.
    Navarro R; Fernández-Sánchez V; López-Gil N
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Feb; 91(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 24270635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of age, decentration, aberrations and pupil size on subjective image quality with concentric bifocal optics.
    Rio D; Woog K; Legras R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Jul; 36(4):411-20. PubMed ID: 27196105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of the Cavitron Autorefractor 7 with contact lenses and non contact lens wearing patients.
    Koetting RA; Akerman DH; Koetting RR
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1983 Feb; 54(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 6841865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of refraction--a literature review.
    Goss DA; Grosvenor T
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):619-30. PubMed ID: 8942135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraocular lens power selection in the second eye of patients undergoing bilateral, sequential cataract extraction.
    Covert DJ; Henry CR; Koenig SB
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Jan; 117(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 19815281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new subjective refraction method--the meridional polarized vernier optometer.
    Salmon TO; Horner DG
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):599-605. PubMed ID: 8942132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.