These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3963153)

  • 1. Use of the California Consonant Test in evaluating hearing aids.
    Edgerton BJ; Danhauer JL; Simmons FJ
    Am J Otol; 1986 Mar; 7(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 3963153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consonant identification in quiet and in noise with the normal and the sensorineural hearing-impaired.
    Givens GD; Jacobs-Condit L
    J Aud Res; 1981 Oct; 21(4):279-85. PubMed ID: 7186504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of extended-range frequency-response amplification in hearing aids.
    Forrester JI; Raffin MJ
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7187908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
    Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of fitting formulas in programmable hearing aids on speech discrimination in noise.
    Dündar SE; Aksoy S
    Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2007; 17(5):278-82. PubMed ID: 18187987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hearing aid low frequency cut: effect on Mandarin tone and vowel perception in normal-hearing listeners.
    Zhang J; McPherson B
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(4):179-87. PubMed ID: 18446038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Binaural speech discrimination under noise in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kumar KV; Rao AB
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1988 Oct; 59(10):932-6. PubMed ID: 3190620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
    Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; van der Pouw CT; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 11465298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of age on clinical hearing aid evaluation results.
    Surr RK
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 3(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 893193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of a programmable 3-channel compression hearing system with single-channel AGC instruments.
    Kiessling J; Steffens T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():67-74. PubMed ID: 8153566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers.
    Narendran MM; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of hearing aid users' satisfaction.
    Gerber SE; Fisher LB
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 511657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Normal and hearing-impaired word recognition scores for monosyllabic words in quiet and noise.
    Beattie RC; Barr T; Roup C
    Br J Audiol; 1997 Jun; 31(3):153-64. PubMed ID: 9276098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of a new nonelectronic all-in-the-ear hearing device for mild hearing loss.
    Goode RL; O'Keefe R; Homan D; Hosford-Dunn H; Wood M
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1986 Mar; 94(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 3083363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.