These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 396344)
1. [Accuracy of the laminated reversible and irreversible hydrocolloid impression technique (author's transl)]. Ohba J Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1979 Dec; 46(4):256-68. PubMed ID: 396344 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Studies on dimensional accuracy of indirect working model in fixed partial dentures--laminated reversible and irreversible hydrocolloid impression method (author's transl)]. Yawata S Shigaku; 1978 Apr; 65(6):1074-85. PubMed ID: 397426 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Studies on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials. Part 2. Comparison of dimensional accuracy of casts made by both single polyether rubber impression and the combined reversible and irreversible hydrocolloid impression technique (author's transl)]. Shigeto N; Inohara N; Yamada S Hiroshima Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1978; 10(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 396327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the dimensional accuracy of a combined reversible/irreversible hydrocolloid impression system with other commonly used impression materials. Herring HW; Tames MA; Zardiackas LD J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Dec; 52(6):795-9. PubMed ID: 6392511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The influence of form trays on the reproducibility of stone casts obtained from alginate impressions (author's transl)]. Sandini MS; de Abreu D Estomatol Cult; 1975; 9(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 801872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy and bond strength of reversible with irreversible hydrocolloid impression systems: a comparative study. Heisler WH; Tjan AH J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Oct; 68(4):578-84. PubMed ID: 1403933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors that affect the adhesion of two irreversible hydrocolloid materials to two custom tray materials. Smith SJ; McCord JF; Macfarlane TV J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):423-30. PubMed ID: 12447220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Surfaces of stone models made by the laminated single impression technique with silicone materials (author's transl)]. Daito K; Miyauchi H; Okuno T; Mitani S; Takatsu T Nihon Shika Zairyo Kikai Gakkai Zasshi; 1974 Jun; 31(2):27-31. PubMed ID: 4620680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of selected variables on the retention of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material. Al-Athel MS J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):57-64. PubMed ID: 18784860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laboratory evaluation of the reversible/irreversible hydrocolloid impression technique. Thomasz FG; Chong MP; Tyas MJ Aust Dent J; 1988 Dec; 33(6):496-500. PubMed ID: 3072945 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional investigation of the accuracy of impression materials after disinfection. Kern M; Rathmer RM; Strub JR J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Nov; 70(5):449-56. PubMed ID: 8254550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of the laminated single impression technique with silicone materials. Fusayama T; Iwaku M; Daito K; Nurosaki N; Takatsu T J Prosthet Dent; 1974 Sep; 32(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 4612141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of stone casts produced by perforated trays and nonperforated trays. Woodward JD; Morris JC; Khan Z J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Mar; 53(3):347-50. PubMed ID: 3886882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of disposable and custom-made impression trays on the accuracy of impressions. Burton JF; Hood JA; Plunkett DJ; Johnson SS J Dent; 1989 Jun; 17(3):121-3. PubMed ID: 2671076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]