These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3964714)
1. Comparison of Doppler echocardiographic peak frequency and turbulence parameters in the quantification of aortic stenosis in a pulsatile flow model. Cannon SR; Richards KL; Morgann RG Circulation; 1985 Jan; 71(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 3964714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Doppler echocardiographic estimates of pressure gradients in various types of stenoses: usefulness and limitations]. Nakajima T; Arakaki Y; Kamiya T; Ogawa M; Sano T; Yabuuchi H; Sato I; Yamada O; Miyatake K; Tomita H J Cardiol; 1989 Sep; 19(3):851-8. PubMed ID: 2641778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of aortic stenosis severity: role of contrast echocardiography in comparison with conventional echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. Almeida AG; Sargento L; Gabriel HM; da Costa JM; Morais J; Madeira F; David C; Oliveira J; da Cunha JC; Vagueiro MC Rev Port Cardiol; 2002 May; 21(5):555-72. PubMed ID: 12174519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of varying degrees of stenosis on the characteristics of turbulent pulsatile flow through heart valves. Bluestein D; Einav S J Biomech; 1995 Aug; 28(8):915-24. PubMed ID: 7673259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pressure recovery in aortic stenosis: an in vitro study in a pulsatile flow model. Voelker W; Reul H; Stelzer T; Schmidt A; Karsch KR J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Dec; 20(7):1585-93. PubMed ID: 1452933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients. Currie PJ; Seward JB; Reeder GS; Vlietstra RE; Bresnahan DR; Bresnahan JF; Smith HC; Hagler DJ; Tajik AJ Circulation; 1985 Jun; 71(6):1162-9. PubMed ID: 3995710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Potential role of Reynolds number in resolving Doppler- and catheter-based transvalvular gradient discrepancies in aortic stenosis. Adams JC; Jiamsripong P; Belohlavek M; McMahon EM; Marupakula V; Heys J; Chaliki HP J Heart Valve Dis; 2011 Mar; 20(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 21560814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ventricular stroke work loss: validation of a method of quantifying the severity of aortic stenosis and derivation of an orifice formula. Sprigings DC; Chambers JB; Cochrane T; Allen J; Jackson G J Am Coll Cardiol; 1990 Dec; 16(7):1608-14. PubMed ID: 2254546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Profiles of coronary blood flow velocity in patients with aortic stenosis and the effect of valve replacement: a transthoracic echocardiographic study. Kenny A; Wisbey CR; Shapiro LM Br Heart J; 1994 Jan; 71(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 8297696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of high pulse repetition frequency and continuous wave Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of high flow velocity in patients with valvular stenosis and regurgitation. Stewart WJ; Galvin KA; Gillam LD; Guyer DE; Weyman AE J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Sep; 6(3):565-71. PubMed ID: 4031267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Left ventricular mass regression is independent of gradient drop and effective orifice area after aortic valve replacement with a porcine bioprosthesis. Sádaba JR; Herregods MC; Bogaert J; Harringer W; Gerosa G J Heart Valve Dis; 2012 Nov; 21(6):788-94. PubMed ID: 23409363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The value of Doppler echocardiography findings in selecting patients with aortic stenosis for surgical intervention]. Punzengruber C; Gilhofer R; Pachinger O Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1989 Mar; 101(6):204-8. PubMed ID: 2711694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]