These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3965028)

  • 1. Effect of age on contrast sensitivity function: uniocular and binocular findings.
    Ross JE; Clarke DD; Bron AJ
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1985 Jan; 69(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 3965028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of spatial frequency on binocular contrast inhibition.
    Pardhan S; Gilchrist J; Douthwaite W
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1989 Jan; 9(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 2594377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fechner's paradox in binocular contrast sensitivity.
    Gilchrist J; McIver C
    Vision Res; 1985; 25(4):609-13. PubMed ID: 4060615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Binocular contrast detection with unequal monocular illuminance.
    Gilchrist J; Pardhan S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1987; 7(4):373-7. PubMed ID: 3454912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrast sensitivity decline with ageing: a neural or optical phenomenon?
    Elliott DB
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1987; 7(4):415-9. PubMed ID: 3454919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human visual spatio-temporal frequency performance as a function of age.
    Nameda N; Kawara T; Ohzu H
    Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Nov; 66(11):760-5. PubMed ID: 2616136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood.
    Owsley C; Sekuler R; Siemsen D
    Vision Res; 1983; 23(7):689-99. PubMed ID: 6613011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of defocus on edge contrast sensitivity.
    Jansonius NM; Kooijman AC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Mar; 17(2):128-32. PubMed ID: 9196675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age variations in normal human contrast sensitivity.
    Derefeldt G; Lennerstrand G; Lundh B
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1979 Aug; 57(4):679-90. PubMed ID: 525292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binocular reaction times to contrast increments.
    Westendorf D; Blake R
    Vision Res; 1988; 28(2):355-9. PubMed ID: 3414023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binocularity in the little owl, Athene noctua. II. Properties of visually evoked potentials from the Wulst in response to monocular and binocular stimulation with sine wave gratings.
    Porciatti V; Fontanesi G; Raffaelli A; Bagnoli P
    Brain Behav Evol; 1990; 35(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 2340414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suprathreshold contrast perception at different luminance levels.
    Biondini AR; de Mattiello ML
    Vision Res; 1985; 25(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 3984207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The pattern electroretinogram by skin electrodes: effect of spatial frequency and age.
    Porciatti V; Falsini B; Scalia G; Fadda A; Fontanesi G
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1988 Sep; 70(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 3229289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrast sensitivity measurements in acute and resolved optic neuritis.
    Beck RW; Ruchman MC; Savino PJ; Schatz NJ
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1984 Oct; 68(10):756-9. PubMed ID: 6477856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accommodation for flickering stimuli.
    Owens DA; Wolfe JM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1985; 5(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 4047653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differential effects of aging on spatial contrast sensitivity to linear and polar sine-wave gratings.
    Costa TL; Nogueira RM; Pereira AG; Santos NA
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2013 Oct; 46(10):855-60. PubMed ID: 24141613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contrast sensitivity versus visual acuity in retinal disease.
    Marmor MF
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1986 Jul; 70(7):553-9. PubMed ID: 3487345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual comparison of an artificial pupil contact lens to monovision.
    García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Radhakrishnan H; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jul; 89(7):E1022-9. PubMed ID: 22729169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The importance of measuring binocular contrast sensitivity in unilateral cataract.
    Pardhan S; Gilchrist J
    Eye (Lond); 1991; 5 ( Pt 1)():31-5. PubMed ID: 2060667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.