These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3966507)

  • 1. Antepartum fetal heart rate testing. XII. The effect of manual manipulation of the fetus on the nonstress test.
    Druzin ML; Gratacos J; Paul RH; Broussard P; McCart D; Smith M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jan; 151(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 3966507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Antepartum surveillance in diabetic pregnancies: predictors of fetal distress in labor.
    Kjos SL; Leung A; Henry OA; Victor MR; Paul RH; Medearis AL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Nov; 173(5):1532-9. PubMed ID: 7503197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic components of the nonreactive nonstress test.
    Ingardia CJ; Cetrulo CL; Knuppel RA; Kappy KA; Scerbo JC; Lake M; Aumann G
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep; 56(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 7422169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Antepartum fetal heart rate testing. I. Evolution of the nonstress test.
    Evertson LR; Gauthier RJ; Schifrin BS; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Jan; 133(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 760532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sequential nonstress testing with use of each fetus as its own control.
    Devoe LD; Castillo R; McKenzie J; Searle N; Robinson B; Davis H
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Apr; 154(4):931-6. PubMed ID: 3754387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fetal acoustic stimulation testing: a retrospective experience with the fetal acoustic stimulation test.
    Smith CV; Phelan JP; Paul RH; Broussard P
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 153(5):567-9. PubMed ID: 4061521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prospective analysis of the influence of gestational age on the baseline fetal heart rate and reactivity in a low-risk population.
    Smith CV; Phelan JP; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Dec; 153(7):780-2. PubMed ID: 4073143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Population differences affect the interpretation of fetal nonstress test results.
    Johnson TR; Paine LL; Strobino DM; Witter FR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Sep; 179(3 Pt 1):779-83. PubMed ID: 9757989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The evaluation of antepartum fetal well-being using the nonstress test.
    Paul RH
    Clin Perinatol; 1982 Jun; 9(2):253-63. PubMed ID: 6749370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preterm premature rupture of membranes: detection of infection.
    Roussis P; Rosemond RL; Glass C; Boehm FH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Oct; 165(4 Pt 1):1099-104. PubMed ID: 1951522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Antepartum fetal heart rate testing. IV. The nonstress test as a primary approach.
    Keegan KA; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Jan; 136(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 6444346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Percent acceleration time: a new method of fetal assessment.
    Devoe LD; Castillo R; Saad S; McKenzie J; Searle N; Davis H
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Feb; 67(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 3945428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical implications of prospective antepartum fetal heart rate testing.
    Devoe LD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 137(8):983-90. PubMed ID: 7405996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. II. A randomized clinical comparison with the nonstress test.
    Smith CV; Phelan JP; Platt LD; Broussard P; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jul; 155(1):131-4. PubMed ID: 3524234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective trial of the fetal biophysical profile versus the nonstress test in the management of high-risk pregnancies.
    Platt LD; Walla CA; Paul RH; Trujillo ME; Loesser CV; Jacobs ND; Broussard PM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 153(6):624-33. PubMed ID: 4061530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized controlled trial of a new fetal acoustic stimulation test for fetal well-being.
    Marden D; McDuffie RS; Allen R; Abitz D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 176(6):1386-8. PubMed ID: 9215204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The nonstress test: an evaluation of 1,000 patients.
    Barrett JM; Salyer SL; Boehm FH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Sep; 141(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 7282790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Antepartum fetal surveillance in gestational diabetes mellitus.
    Landon MB; Gabbe SG
    Diabetes; 1985 Jun; 34 Suppl 2():50-4. PubMed ID: 3888742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The nonstress test: a review of 3,000 tests.
    Phelan JP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Jan; 139(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 7457525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of maternal cocaine use on the fetus: changes in antepartum fetal heart rate tracings.
    Tabor BL; Soffici AR; Smith-Wallace T; Yonekura ML
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 165(5 Pt 1):1278-81. PubMed ID: 1957845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.