These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3966995)

  • 1. The 'birth plan' experience.
    Ekeocha CE; Jackson P
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1985 Jan; 92(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 3966995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Women's perceptions of birth plans.
    Whitford HM; Hillan EM
    Midwifery; 1998 Dec; 14(4):248-53. PubMed ID: 10076320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transfer from primary maternity unit to tertiary hospital in New Zealand - timing, frequency, reasons, urgency and outcomes: Part of the Evaluating Maternity Units study.
    Grigg CP; Tracy SK; Tracy M; Schmied V; Monk A
    Midwifery; 2015 Sep; 31(9):879-87. PubMed ID: 26002990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Women's experiences of transfer from primary maternity unit to tertiary hospital in New Zealand: part of the prospective cohort Evaluating Maternity Units study.
    Grigg CP; Tracy SK; Schmied V; Monk A; Tracy MB
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Dec; 15():339. PubMed ID: 26679339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do birth plans empower women? Evaluation of a hospital birth plan.
    Moore M; Hopper U
    Birth; 1995 Mar; 22(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 7741948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A birth plan--effects and evaluation].
    Gulbrandsen P; Aarseth J; Aaby E; Valdal A
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2004 Dec; 124(23):3055-7. PubMed ID: 15586186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of satisfaction with care in a midwifery unit and an obstetric unit: a randomized controlled trial of low-risk women.
    Bernitz S; Øian P; Sandvik L; Blix E
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Jun; 16(1):143. PubMed ID: 27316335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early labour experience questionnaire: Psychometric testing and women's experiences in a Swedish setting.
    Ängeby K; Sandin-Bojö AK; Persenius M; Wilde-Larsson B
    Midwifery; 2018 Sep; 64():77-84. PubMed ID: 29966880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of low-risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of care: shared-care (consultant) and integrated general practice unit. II. Labour and delivery management and neonatal outcome.
    Klein M; Lloyd I; Redman C; Bull M; Turnbull AC
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1983 Feb; 90(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 6824612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Birth plans: the good, the bad, and the future.
    Lothian J
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2006; 35(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 16620258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What next? Taking normal birth out of the labour ward.
    Rosser J; Anderson T
    Pract Midwife; 2000 Apr; 3(4):4-5. PubMed ID: 11146939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An analysis of 3,199 patients booked for delivery in general-practitioner obstetric units.
    Richmond GA
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1977 Jul; 27(180):406-13. PubMed ID: 894639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relative costs of home and hospital confinement.
    Stilwell JA
    Br Med J; 1979 Jul; 2(6184):257-9. PubMed ID: 476407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Obstetric care in mothers booked for a general practitioner maternity unit.
    Geals MF; Howat RC
    Health Bull (Edinb); 1977 Sep; 35(5):243-8. PubMed ID: 903229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Collaborative planning of patient care in the prenatal, labor and delivery, and neonatal settings.
    Artinian BM
    JOGN Nurs; 1984; 13(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 6562252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Antenatal care: a comparison of demographic and obstetric characteristics of early and late attenders in the Niger Delta, Nigeria.
    Ebeigbe PN; Igberase GO
    Med Sci Monit; 2005 Nov; 11(11):CR529-32. PubMed ID: 16258397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The place of 'active birth' in present-day obstetric practice.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Sonnendecker EW
    S Afr Med J; 1985 Sep; 68(7):473-5. PubMed ID: 4049160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Gynecology and obstetrics in the Bible. II. Labor and the puerperium].
    Dumont M
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1990; 19(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 2182700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. First-time mothers' expectations of the unknown territory of childbirth: Uncertainties, coping strategies and 'going with the flow'.
    Borrelli SE; Walsh D; Spiby H
    Midwifery; 2018 Aug; 63():39-45. PubMed ID: 29778717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Birth plans-Impact on mode of delivery, obstetrical interventions, and birth experience satisfaction: A prospective cohort study.
    Afshar Y; Mei JY; Gregory KD; Kilpatrick SJ; Esakoff TF
    Birth; 2018 Mar; 45(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 29094374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.