These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3969147)

  • 1. Warnock proposals in trouble.
    Nature; 1985 Feb 7-13; 313(6002):417. PubMed ID: 3969147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confused comment on Warnock.
    Nature; 1984 Nov 29-Dec 5; 312(5993):389. PubMed ID: 6504148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Artificial fertilization made natural.
    Nature; 1984 Jul 26-Aug 1; 310(5975):269. PubMed ID: 6462213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assisted fertilization: legal restraints proposed for UK.
    Nature; 1984 Jul 26-Aug 1; 310(5975):266. PubMed ID: 6462211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimenting and the new biology: "a consummation devoutly to be wished".
    Scott R
    Law Med Health Care; 1986 Sep; 14(3-4):123-8. PubMed ID: 3645219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Artificial reproduction: unrestrictive guidelines for UK.
    Abel J
    Nature; 1984 Jun 21-27; 309(5970):662. PubMed ID: 6728026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Warnock report on human fertilization and embryology.
    J Adv Nurs; 1985 Jul; 10(4):375-84. PubMed ID: 3850104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. UK agonizes on embryo research.
    Nature; 1985 Feb 7-13; 313(6002):424. PubMed ID: 3969148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Warnock report on human fertilisation and embryology.
    Wells WT
    Lancet; 1984 Sep; 2(8401):531-2. PubMed ID: 6147600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Commons debates Warnock report.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Dec; 289(6458):1639. PubMed ID: 11652438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro fertilisation: legislation and problems of research.
    Dawson K
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 Nov; 295(6607):1184-6. PubMed ID: 3120937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. House of Commons votes for ban on embryo research.
    Med World News; 1985 Apr; 26(7):30. PubMed ID: 11649605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lords worry over Warnock.
    Russell W
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Nov; 289(6454):1321. PubMed ID: 11653633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Warnock report on human fertilisation and embryology.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):238-9. PubMed ID: 6146804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Life with the new technologies.
    Nature; 1984 Mar 1-7; 308(5954):1-2. PubMed ID: 6700706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recommendations of the Warnock Committee.
    Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):217-8. PubMed ID: 6146766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human reproduction: regulated progress or damned interference?
    Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):202-4. PubMed ID: 6146756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Report of the Warnock Committee on Human Fertilisation and Embryology.
    Priest JA
    Mod Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 48(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 16100813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A welcome report.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Jul; 289(6439):207-8. PubMed ID: 6430410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why Warnock's 14-day rule may be unworkable.
    Connor S
    New Sci; 1985 Jan; 105(1438):6. PubMed ID: 11658553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.