BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3969236)

  • 1. Laboratory reliability of the Papanicolaou smear.
    Yobs AR; Swanson RA; Lamotte LC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Feb; 65(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 3969236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the cervical cytology test using the PAPNET method and conventional microscopy.
    Weissbrod D; Torres M; Rodríguez A; Ureña I; Estrada J; Reyes ME; Carreto AJ
    Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1996 Dec; 30(4):339-47. PubMed ID: 9041745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [False negative Pap smears in a Danish material].
    Ejersbo D; Dahl MB; Hølund B
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jun; 165(23):2391-4. PubMed ID: 12840998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. False-positive squamous cell carcinoma in cervical smears: cytologic-histologic correlation in 19 cases.
    Levine PH; Elgert PA; Mittal K
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jan; 28(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 12508178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. False-negative results in cervical cytologic studies.
    Gay JD; Donaldson LD; Goellner JR
    Acta Cytol; 1985; 29(6):1043-6. PubMed ID: 3866457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. False-negative Papanicolaou smears from women with cancerous and precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Pairwuti S
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 1994633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cytology and colposcopy in the diagnosis and management of outpatients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Allahverdian V; Valaitis J; Kalis O; Pearlman S
    J Reprod Med; 1980 Jan; 24(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7359496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The significance of cervical cytologic dysplasia.
    Jordan SW; Smith NL; Dike LS
    Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 6942614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual inspection of the uterine cervix after the application of acetic acid in the detection of cervical carcinoma and its precursors.
    Sankaranarayanan R; Wesley R; Somanathan T; Dhakad N; Shyamalakumary B; Amma NS; Parkin DM; Nair MK
    Cancer; 1998 Nov; 83(10):2150-6. PubMed ID: 9827719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The accuracy and consistency of the cytologic classification of squamous lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Kern Wh; Zivolich MR
    Acta Cytol; 1977; 21(4):519-23. PubMed ID: 269601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DNA-cytometric diagnosis of prospective malignancy in borderline lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Böcking A; Hilgarth M; Auffermann W; Hack-Werdier C; Fischer-Becker D; von Kalkreuth G
    Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(6):608-15. PubMed ID: 3466496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the adequacy of Pap smears.
    Baker RM
    Am Fam Physician; 1989 Jun; 39(6):109-14. PubMed ID: 2729036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Critical observations on the rate of "False Negative" findings in gynecologic cytology (author's transl)].
    Bayrle W
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1977 Oct; 37(10):864-8. PubMed ID: 924093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
    Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of preoperative exfoliative cervical cytology with subsequent histology.
    Parker A; Ueki M
    N Z Med J; 1986 Jun; 99(803):414-6. PubMed ID: 3461355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Paired cervical smears: a method of reducing the false-negative rate in population screening.
    Beilby JO; Bourne R; Guillebaud J; Steele ST
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Jul; 60(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 7088450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Papanicolaou smear sensitivity for the detection of adenocarcinoma of the cervix: a study of 49 cases.
    Krane JF; Granter SR; Trask CE; Hogan CL; Lee KR
    Cancer; 2001 Feb; 93(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11241260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Information, discrimination and divergence in cytology. III. Optimization of classification of Papanicolaou smears.
    Okagaki T; Fujimura M; Zelterman D
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 1994631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Positive predictive value of liquid-based and conventional cervical Papanicolaou smears reported as malignant.
    Uyar DS; Eltabbakh GH; Mount SL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2003 May; 89(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 12713984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Glandular cell atypia on Papanicolaou smears: interobserver variability in the diagnosis and prediction of cell of origin.
    Simsir A; Hwang S; Cangiarella J; Elgert P; Levine P; Sheffield MV; Roberson J; Talley L; Chhieng DC
    Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):323-30. PubMed ID: 14681938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.