These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3969463)

  • 21. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sensitometric effects of varying the intensifying screens used with Agfa Dentus ST8G and RP6 panoramic radiographic films.
    Wakoh M; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Kitagawa H; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jul; 26(4):225-9. PubMed ID: 9442613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Digital radiography of subtle pulmonary abnormalities: an ROC study of the effect of pixel size on observer performance.
    MacMahon H; Vyborny CJ; Metz CE; Doi K; Sabeti V; Solomon SL
    Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 3940383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparative evaluation of rare-earth screen-film systems. System speed, contrast, sensitometry, RMS noise, square-wave response function, and contrast-dose-detail analysis.
    Fearon T; Vucich J; Hoe J; McSweeney WJ; Potter BM
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Aug; 21(8):654-62. PubMed ID: 3744739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Digital image intensifier radiography and film-screen combinations in pulmonary nodules].
    Dölken W; Krahe T; Landwehr P; Jenett M
    Rofo; 1989 Aug; 151(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 2548236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Interstitial lung disease: impact of postprocessing in digital storage phosphor imaging.
    Schaefer CM; Greene R; Llewellyn HJ; Mrose HE; Pile-Spellman EA; Rubens JR; Lindemann SR
    Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):733-8. PubMed ID: 1994410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Compatibility characteristics of five radiographic films utilised in Brazilian diagnostic radiology.
    Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; de Almeida CE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Sep; 156(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 23651656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The clinical evaluation of cephalograms using the single screen/single emulsion film system for improving image quality].
    Tanimoto K; Yamada K; Kodera Y; Imagawa H; Yoneda H; Sunayashiki T; Ogawa M; Wada T; Yamauchi K
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1986 Mar; 45(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 3458848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Contrast gradient and the detection of lung nodules.
    Kundel HL; Revesz G; Toto L
    Invest Radiol; 1979; 14(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 478790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Fracture diagnosis with digital luminescence radiography].
    Klein HM; Wein B; Langen HJ; Glaser KH; Stargardt A; Günther RW
    Rofo; 1991 Jun; 154(6):582-6. PubMed ID: 1648759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
    De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Breast imaging: a comparison of digital luminescence radiographs displayed on TV-monitor and film-screen mammography.
    Jarlman O; Borg A; Braw M; Kehler M; Lyttkens K; Samuelsson L
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1994; 18(5):375-81. PubMed ID: 7812984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [New realities in the modern X-ray technology].
    Blinov NN; Mazurov AI
    Med Tekh; 2003; (5):3-6. PubMed ID: 14603840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Film-screen vs. digital radiography in rheumatoid arthritis of the hand. An ROC analysis.
    Jónsson A; Borg A; Hannesson P; Herrlin K; Jonsson K; Sloth M; Petterson H
    Acta Radiol; 1994 Jul; 35(4):311-8. PubMed ID: 8011377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Effect of the radiation energy on patient radiation load and on the imaging width in lung study].
    Gurvich AM; Gurevich LA; Leonova NI; Maslov LA; Tombak MI
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1989 Jul; 34(7):67-72. PubMed ID: 2761376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of digital radiography using stimulable phosphor for diagnosis of pneumothorax.
    Kehler M; Albrechtsson U; Andrésdóttir A; Lárusdóttir H; Lundin A
    Acta Radiol; 1990 Jan; 31(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 2187511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Image contrast in various cassette-screen-film combinations].
    Barth HH; Grasser H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1985 Dec; 40(12):1230-4. PubMed ID: 3869536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparative evaluation of rare earth screen-film systems. Free-response operating characteristic analysis and anatomic criteria analysis.
    Fearon T; Vucich J; McSweeney WJ; Potter BM; Brallier DR; McIlhenny J; Tepper J; Markle BM
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Sep; 21(9):734-42. PubMed ID: 3771159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of optical unsharp masking and contrast enhancement of low-scatter chest radiographs.
    Sorenson JA; Mitchell CR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Aug; 149(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 3496751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.