These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3969486)

  • 21. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
    Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of visual grading analysis and determination of detective quantum efficiency for evaluating system performance in digital chest radiography.
    Sund P; Båth M; Kheddache S; Månsson LG
    Eur Radiol; 2004 Jan; 14(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 14564469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and effective dose using four digital systems.
    Pascoal A; Lawinski CP; Mackenzie A; Tabakov S; Lewis CA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):273-7. PubMed ID: 15933121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative scatter and dose performance of slot-scan and full-field digital chest radiography systems.
    Samei E; Lo JY; Yoshizumi TT; Jesneck JL; Dobbins JT; Floyd CE; McAdams HP; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):940-9. PubMed ID: 15845791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bayesian image estimation of digital chest radiography: interdependence of noise, resolution, and scatter fraction.
    Baydush AH; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 1995 Aug; 22(8):1255-61. PubMed ID: 7476711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of low contrast detectability between a digital amorphous silicon and a screen-film based imaging system for thoracic radiography.
    Aufrichtig R
    Med Phys; 1999 Jul; 26(7):1349-58. PubMed ID: 10435537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Digital chest radiography system with amorphous selenium flat-panel detectors: Qualitative and dosimetric comparison with a dedicated film-screen system.
    Prato A; Ropolo R; Fava C
    Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):561-73. PubMed ID: 16437042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Metz S; Damoser P; Hollweck R; Roggel R; Engelke C; Woertler K; Renger B; Rummeny EJ; Link TM
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 15734933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Imaging characteristics evaluation of a digital radiography system.
    Moro L; Pannella A; Bassetti C; Fantinato D; Baldi M; Bertoli G
    Radiol Med; 2003; 106(1-2):94-102. PubMed ID: 12951556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Experiences with digital luminescence radiography (DLR) in pediatric radiology].
    Vosshenrich R; Weigel W; Fischer U; Funke M; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1992 Feb; 156(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 1739766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Imaging quality of a digital Konica Regius 336 system for thoracic radiology].
    Ostinelli A; Frigerio M; Monti AF; Gelosa S; Tognoli P; Perniola N; Gozzi G
    Radiol Med; 2000 Jun; 99(6):465-8. PubMed ID: 11262825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Hologic's Flat-Panel Detector].
    Ogata Y; Matsumoto M; Suekane K
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):264-75. PubMed ID: 12766272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of an asymmetric screen-film system for chest radiography.
    Morishita J; MacMahon H; Doi K; Carlin M; Sukenobu Y
    Med Phys; 1994 Nov; 21(11):1769-75. PubMed ID: 7891639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems.
    Marshall NW; Monnin P; Bosmans H; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4201-20. PubMed ID: 21701051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Contrast-detail evaluation and dose assessment of eight digital chest radiography systems in clinical practice.
    Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Boot MV; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
    Eur Radiol; 2006 Feb; 16(2):333-41. PubMed ID: 16132918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of a new ultraviolet-emitting rare-earth film-screen combination.
    Farajollahi AR; Sutton D
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Jun; 70(834):629-34. PubMed ID: 9227257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A detector for scanned projection radiography.
    Sones RA; Lauro KL; Cattell CL
    Radiology; 1990 May; 175(2):553-9. PubMed ID: 2326481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Requirements and their realization in thoracic radiography].
    Biebesheimer V
    Offentl Gesundheitswes; 1989; 51(8-9):512-5. PubMed ID: 2531342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.