These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3969487)

  • 1. Ultra-high-strip-density radiographic grids: a new antiscatter technique for mammography.
    Chan HP; Frank PH; Doi K; Iida N; Higashida Y
    Radiology; 1985 Mar; 154(3):807-15. PubMed ID: 3969487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Mammography using stationary grids. Qualitative and dosimetric considerations].
    Burke P; Fasciano F; Frigerio A; Spandonari T; Temporelli A
    Radiol Med; 1986 Sep; 72(9):660-3. PubMed ID: 3763970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physical and clinical evaluation of new high-strip-density radiographic grids.
    Doi K; Frank PH; Chan HP; Vyborny CJ; Makino S; Iida N; Carlin M
    Radiology; 1983 May; 147(2):575-82. PubMed ID: 6340160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigation of the performance of antiscatter grids: Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Chan HP; Doi K
    Phys Med Biol; 1982 Jun; 27(6):785-803. PubMed ID: 7111390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Grids in mammography.
    Egan RL; McSweeney MB; Sprawls P
    Radiology; 1983 Feb; 146(2):359-62. PubMed ID: 6849083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental evaluation of fiber-interspaced antiscatter grids for large patient imaging with digital x-ray systems.
    Fetterly KA; Schueler BA
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4863-80. PubMed ID: 17671340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physical evaluation of prototype high-performance anti-scatter grids: potential for improved digital radiographic image quality.
    Fetterly KA; Schueler BA
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):N37-42. PubMed ID: 19098352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and Monte Carlo analysis of antiscatter grids for mammography.
    Boone JM; Makarova OV; Zyryanov VN; Tang CM; Mancini DC; Moldovan N; Divan R
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2002 Dec; 1(6):441-7. PubMed ID: 12625771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monte Carlo study of grid performance in diagnostic radiology: task dependent optimization for screen-film imaging.
    Sandborg M; Dance DR; Carlsson GA; Persliden J
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Jan; 67(793):76-85. PubMed ID: 8298879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammography grid performance.
    Rezentes PS; de Almeida A; Barnes GT
    Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):227-32. PubMed ID: 9885613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monte Carlo simulation of primary electron production inside an a-selenium detector for x-ray mammography: physics.
    Sakellaris T; Spyrou G; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(16):3717-38. PubMed ID: 16077223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficiency of antiscatter grids for flat-detector CT.
    Kyriakou Y; Kalender W
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(20):6275-93. PubMed ID: 17921585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of scatter-to-primary ratio, grid performance and normalized average glandular dose in mammography by Monte Carlo simulation including interference and energy broadening effects.
    Cunha DM; Tomal A; Poletti ME
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(15):4335-59. PubMed ID: 20647608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Ultra-high-strip-density grids for mammography: an alternative to grid mammography?].
    Friedrich M
    Rofo; 1986 May; 144(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 3012683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Direct digital magnification mammography with a large-surface detector made of amorphous silicon].
    Hermann KP; Hundertmark C; Funke M; von Brenndorff A; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 10370416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Grid and slot scan scatter reduction in mammography: comparison by using Monte Carlo techniques.
    Boone JM; Seibert JA; Tang CM; Lane SM
    Radiology; 2002 Feb; 222(2):519-27. PubMed ID: 11818623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A comparison between traditional mammography and digital with storage phosphors].
    Lambruschi G; Tagliagambe A; Palla L; Torri T; D'Alessandro F; Pastori R; Barbieri L
    Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):59-64. PubMed ID: 8480050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monte Carlo simulation of a mammographic test phantom.
    Hunt RA; Dance DR; Pachoud M; Alm Carlsson G; Sandborg M; Ullman G; Verdun FR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):432-5. PubMed ID: 15933151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scatter dose calculation for anti-scatter linear grids in mammography.
    Al Kafi MA; Maalej N; Naqvi AA
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009 Oct; 67(10):1837-41. PubMed ID: 19632851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.