105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3969755)
1. Functional evaluation of new experimental model of microsurgical tubulovasostomy in rat.
Tritto G; Mitolo-Chieppa D; Piccinno A; Di Giovanni V; Carratú MR
Urology; 1985 Feb; 25(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 3969755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tubulovasostomy in the rat. A new experimental model.
Belgrano E; Carmignani G; Puppo P; Gaboardi F; Trombetta C
J Androl; 1983; 4(4):253-5. PubMed ID: 6618995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The pull-through technique for the advancement of the unfolded epididymal tubule and the tubulo-deferential telescopic reconstruction.
Tritto G
Ann Urol (Paris); 1989; 23(4):323-5. PubMed ID: 2589829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microsurgically splinted tubulovasostomy in the rat: modified technique.
Papadopoulos I; Kelâmi A
Urol Int; 1985; 40(2):112-5. PubMed ID: 3887713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microsurgical epididymovasostomy by loop intussusception. A new technique in the rat model.
Stefanović KB; Clark SA; Buncke HJ
Br J Urol; 1991 Nov; 68(5):518-23. PubMed ID: 1747729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microsurgical epididymovasostomy by tubule intussusception: a new technique in rat model.
Stefanovic KB; Clark SA; Buncke HJ
Fertil Steril; 1991 Jan; 55(1):189-93. PubMed ID: 1986959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microscopic vasoepididymostomy: specific microanastomosis to the epididymal tubule.
Silber SJ
Fertil Steril; 1978 Nov; 30(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 720645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vasoepididymostomy to the head of the epididymis: a comparative study of two microsurgical techniques in the rabbit.
Vancaillie T; Gordts S; Boeckx W; Vasquez G; Brosens I
Acta Eur Fertil; 1984; 15(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 6730862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microsurgical vaso-epididymostomy in 2 layers.
Garibyan H; De Jong EA
Br J Urol; 1990 Jun; 65(6):634-7. PubMed ID: 2372677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Alpha 1-adrenoceptors and calcium sources in adrenergic neurogenic contractions of rat vas deferens.
Bültmann R; Kurz AK; Starke K
Br J Pharmacol; 1994 Jan; 111(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 7912153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The epithelial mounds of the distal epididymal tubule (zone 9) after new microsurgical models of tubulo-vasostomy. Study in the rat.
Tritto G
Reprod Nutr Dev (1980); 1988; 28(5):1357-62. PubMed ID: 2473500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Epididymo-deferens anastomosis. Experimental study in the rat].
Hacker P; Roth A; Nezelof C; Cukier J
J Urol (Paris); 1983; 89(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 6875300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Ideal experimental microsurgical methods in vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy].
Drawz B; Drawz G; Putzke HP; Baasner R
Z Exp Chir Transplant Kunstliche Organe; 1987; 20(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 3617849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tubulovasostomy.
Pomerol JM
Urol Int; 2003; 70(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 12592038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Differential epididymal anastomosis. Proposed microsurgical technic. I].
Landi F; Cutini G; Landa L; Maniscalco L; Olivieri V; Pirani M
Minerva Urol; 1983 Mar; 35(1):37-8. PubMed ID: 6877208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Problems unique to microsurgical epididymovasostomy. Comparison of four techniques in a laboratory rat model with review of the literature.
Stefanović KB; Buncke HJ; Clark SA
Int Urol Nephrol; 1993; 25(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 8365850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: a comparison between the end-to-side anastomosis and the invagination technique.
Shekarriz M; Pomer S
Urol Res; 1991; 19(5):285-7. PubMed ID: 1949427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Microsurgical therapy of occlusive azoospermia].
Schwarzer JU; Pickl U; Hofmann R; Hartung R
Urologe A; 1994 Jan; 33(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 8146931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new one-layer epididymovasostomy technique.
Hussein A
BJU Int; 2015 Apr; 115(4):653-8. PubMed ID: 24924910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Re: Comparison of intussusception pull-through end-to-side and conventional end-to-side microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: prospective randomized controlled study in male wistar rats.
Shekarriz B; Pomer S
J Urol; 2003 Jan; 169(1):294. PubMed ID: 12478173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]