These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3971739)

  • 1. Viscosity of iodinated contrast agents: significance for peripheral venous injection.
    Mitchell DG; Friedman AC
    J Comput Tomogr; 1985 Jan; 9(1):77-8. PubMed ID: 3971739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MEGLUMINE IOTHALAMATE 60 PER CENT AND SODIUM DIATRIZOATE 50 PER CENT. COMPARISON OF UROGRAPHIC QUALITY AND SIDE-EFFECTS.
    DOTTER CT; JUDKINS MP
    Radiology; 1964 Feb; 82():225. PubMed ID: 14115299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why does kidney size change during I.V. urography?
    Dorph S; Sovak M; Talner LB; Rosen L
    Invest Radiol; 1977; 12(3):246-50. PubMed ID: 863628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pharmacokinetics of contrast media: experimental results in dog and man with CT implications.
    Gardeur D; Lautrou J; Millard JC; Berger N; Metzger J
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1980 Apr; 4(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 7365016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sequential changes in the CT numbers of the normal canine kidney following intravenous contrast administration. II: The renal medulla.
    Brennan RE; Curtis JA; Pollack HM; Weinberg I
    Invest Radiol; 1979; 14(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 468497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acceptability of oral iodinated contrast media: a head-to-head comparison of four media.
    Pollentine A; Ngan-Soo E; McCoubrie P
    Br J Radiol; 2013 May; 86(1025):20120636. PubMed ID: 23564884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Doses of contrast media.
    Davies P
    Lancet; 1978 Mar; 1(8063):556-7. PubMed ID: 76097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The old and the new: a study of five contrast media for urography.
    Davies P; Panto PN; Buckley J; Richardson RE
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Jul; 58(691):593-7. PubMed ID: 3893610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical evaluation of cardiovascular reactions to renal contrast media using an impedance method (author's transl)].
    Brutschin P; Vock P; Fuchs WA
    Rofo; 1976 Oct; 125(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 136404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the excretion of sodium and meglumine diatrizoate at urography with simulated compression: an experimental study in the rat.
    Owman T
    Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh); 1981 Jul; 49(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 7336961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adverse reactions to urographic contrast medium. Rapid versus slow injection rate.
    Jensen N; Dorph S
    Br J Radiol; 1980 Jul; 53(631):659-61. PubMed ID: 7426887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Injection times and tolerance of various contrast media in urographic and angiographic studies].
    Canigiani G; Deimer E; Wolf G
    Rontgenpraxis; 1974 Dec; 27(12):273-81. PubMed ID: 4450149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peripheral hemodynamic effects of intraventricular and intracoronary contrast media in man.
    Kurnik PB; Tiefenbrunn AJ; Ludbrook PA
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 3988473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of contrast medium dose and image acquisition timing on ureteral opacification in the normal dog as assessed by computed tomography.
    Barthez PY; Begon D; Delisle F
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 1998; 39(6):524-7. PubMed ID: 9845189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Injection rate threshold of triple-lumen central venous catheters: an in vitro study.
    Zamos DT; Emch TM; Patton HA; D'Amico FJ; Bansal SK
    Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):574-8. PubMed ID: 17434071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Product selection criteria for intravascular ionic contrast media.
    Swanson DP; Dick TJ; Simms SM; Thrall JH
    Clin Pharm; 1985; 4(5):527-38. PubMed ID: 3902331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power injection of intravenous contrast material through central venous catheters for CT: in vitro evaluation.
    Herts BR; Cohen MA; McInroy B; Davros WJ; Zepp RC; Einstein DM
    Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):731-5. PubMed ID: 8756923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In-line pressures generated in small-bore central venous catheters during power injection of CT contrast media.
    Ruess L; Bulas DI; Rivera O; Markle BM
    Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):625-9. PubMed ID: 9169679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gadopentetate dimeglumine and iodinated contrast media. Hemodynamic side effects after bolus injections in pigs.
    Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP; Ehrhardt K; Köhnlein S; Radtke W; Heintzen P
    Invest Radiol; 1997 Feb; 32(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 9039584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. NOTE ON INTRAVENOUS PYELOGRAPHY WITH 66.8 PER CENT SODIUM IOTHALAMATE; CONRAY-400, IODINE CONTENT 40 PER CENT.
    STEINBERG I; EVANS JA
    Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1964 Aug; 92():267-9. PubMed ID: 14207569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.