184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3973432)
1. Type and screen system for elective surgery in obstetrics and gynecology.
Nakamura Y; Takano A; Shinagawa S
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Jan; 37(1):141-4. PubMed ID: 3973432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Blood ordering in obstetrics and gynecology: recommendations for the type and screen.
Hill ST; Lavin JP
Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Aug; 62(2):236-40. PubMed ID: 6408546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Type and Screen: immunohematological safety is ensured and costs are lowered].
Riedler GF
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1996 Nov; 126(45):1946-51. PubMed ID: 8992623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost and quality in the use of blood bank services for normal deliveries, cesarean sections, and hysterectomies.
Palmer RH; Kane JG; Churchill WH; Goldman L; Komaroff AL
JAMA; 1986 Jul; 256(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 3723706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Blood type and screen for crossmatch].
Taniwaki K
Rinsho Byori; 1989 Jul; 37(7):745-9. PubMed ID: 2607645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preoperative crossmatch ordering and blood use in elective hysterectomy.
Mintz PD; Sullivan MF
Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Mar; 65(3):389-92. PubMed ID: 3974965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recommendations for a maximum surgical blood ordering schedule in obstetrics and gynaecology.
Arulkumaran S; Ong YW; Ratnam SS; Tham SY; Lun KC
Singapore Med J; 1984 Apr; 25(2):80-3. PubMed ID: 6474208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimal hemotherapy in elective surgery.
Michiels JJ; Bruining HA; Kothe FC
Neth J Surg; 1985 Apr; 37(2):35-7. PubMed ID: 4000516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The type and screen: are patient charges a valid measure of cost reduction?
Ramsey G; Desley C; Ross K; Peck K; Spennachio J; Blumberg N
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 1983; 13(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 6404214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Blood replacement for repeat cesarean section: "type and screen" preferable to cross matching.
Chestnut DH
N C Med J; 1985 Mar; 46(3):139-40. PubMed ID: 3856747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Safety in transfusion practice. Is it safe to eliminate the major crossmatch for selected patients?
Shulman IA; Kent D
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1989 Mar; 113(3):270-2. PubMed ID: 2919957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Benefits realised from a blood transfusion policy for elective joint arthroplasty.
Mackay GM; McGarrity G; Ellis D; Mackay T
Health Bull (Edinb); 1995 Jul; 53(4):206-8. PubMed ID: 7665347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Irregular erythrocytic antibodies as an obstacle to transfusion].
Uhlig R; Endert G; Lammel G
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1984; 78(20):849-52. PubMed ID: 6523909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Is a computer crossmatch in the absence of an immediate-spin antibody screen adequate for persons identified to be at increased risk of forming new blood group antibodies?
Sandler SG; Abedalthagafi M; Langeberg A
Transfusion; 2008 Oct; 48(10):2265-6. PubMed ID: 18928510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Pediatric preoperative blood ordering: when is a type and screen or crossmatch really needed?
Fernández AM; Cronin J; Greenberg RS; Heitmiller ES
Paediatr Anaesth; 2014 Feb; 24(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 23957750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implementation of a two-specimen requirement for verification of ABO/Rh for blood transfusion.
Goodnough LT; Viele M; Fontaine MJ; Jurado C; Stone N; Quach P; Chua L; Chin ML; Scott R; Tokareva I; Tabb K; Sharek PJ
Transfusion; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1321-8. PubMed ID: 19389026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of routine blood type and screen testing before elective laparoscopy.
Ransom SB; McNeeley SG; Hosseini RB
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Sep; 86(3):346-8. PubMed ID: 7651640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Waste not, want not: use of blood in elective operations--improved utilization of blood by use of blood-ordering protocols and the type and screen.
Gryskiewicz JM; Detmer DE
Curr Surg; 1983; 40(5):371-7. PubMed ID: 6627985
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The sustained impact of a group and screen and maximum surgical blood ordering schedule policy on the transfusion practice in gynaecology and obstetrics.
Atrah HI; Galea G; Urbaniak SJ
Clin Lab Haematol; 1995 Jun; 17(2):177-81. PubMed ID: 8536422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Increased efficiency of transfusion practice in routine surgery using pre-operative antibody screening and selective ordering with an abbreviated crossmatch.
Dodsworth H; Dudley HA
Br J Surg; 1985 Feb; 72(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 3971112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
