These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3973521)
1. Time course alterations of QTC interval due to hypaque 76. Amidi M; Shaver J J Electrocardiol; 1985 Jan; 18(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 3973521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [A case of allergic-hyperergic complications after ventriculography and coronarography]. Kowal-Gierczak B; Hirnlowa L; Szczygielski J; Sokalski L Wiad Lek; 1985 Jun; 38(12):861-4. PubMed ID: 4060712 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of calcium-binding additives on ventricular fibrillation and repolarization changes during coronary angiography. Zukerman LS; Friehling TD; Wolf NM; Meister SG; Nahass G; Kowey PR J Am Coll Cardiol; 1987 Dec; 10(6):1249-53. PubMed ID: 3119687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical superiority of a new nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol) for cardiac angiography. Gertz EW; Wisneski JA; Chiu D; Akin JR; Hu C J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Feb; 5(2 Pt 1):250-8. PubMed ID: 3881496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ventricular fibrillation during coronary angiography: reduced incidence in man with contrast media lacking calcium binding additives. Murdock DK; Johnson SA; Loeb HS; Scanlon PJ Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1985; 11(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 3921258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A double-blind clinical comparison of the electrophysiologic adverse effects of Hexabrix and Renografin-76. Wolf GL Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S328-32. PubMed ID: 6392161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of programmed electrical stimulation to assess the fibrillatory propensity of ionic and nonionic contrast media. Murdock DK; Piao ZE; Euler DE; Murdock JD; Hwang MH; Loeb HS; Scanlon PJ Invest Radiol; 1985 Sep; 20(6):579-82. PubMed ID: 4066228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Potentiation by nifedipine and diltiazem of the hypotensive response after contrast angiography. Morris DL; Wisneski JA; Gertz EW; Wexman M; Axelrod R; Langberg JJ J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Oct; 6(4):785-91. PubMed ID: 4031293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selective coronary arteriography: a clinical comparison of two contrast agents. Shirey EK; Sones FM; Greenstreet RL Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1983; 9(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 6627384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in ventricular fibrillation threshold induced by contrast agents during acute coronary artery occlusion. Wolf GL; Mulry CS; Laski PA; Kilzer K Invest Radiol; 1983; 18(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 6862805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Electrocardiographic changes during coronary arteriography]. de Carvalho VB; Passaro LC; Décourt LV; Moffa PJ; Horta PE; de Oliveira SF; Favarato D; Martins JR; Galiano NE; Macruz R Arq Bras Cardiol; 1983 Aug; 41(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 6675603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Incidence of fibrillation with dilute contrast media for intra-arterial coronary digital subtraction angiography. Morris TW; Ventura J Invest Radiol; 1986 May; 21(5):416-8. PubMed ID: 3519525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]