These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3973887)

  • 1. Minneapolis hip prosthesis in severe destructive lesions of the femur.
    Kumar JM; Norcross K
    J R Soc Med; 1985 Mar; 78(3):224-9. PubMed ID: 3973887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Use of the tumor prosthesis in secondary neoplastic destruction of the proximal end of the femur].
    Rompe JD; Eysel P; Hopf C; Heine J; Schaub T
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1993; 131(5):446-51. PubMed ID: 8256493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Total hip arthroplasty in severe segmental femoral bone loss situations: use of a reconstruction modular stem design (JVC IX). Retrospective study of 23 cases.
    Bertani A; Helix M; Louis ML; Rochwerger A; Curvale G
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Nov; 95(7):491-7. PubMed ID: 19833568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Surgical therapy of metastases of the proximal femur and acetabulum].
    Mutschler W; Sabo D; Schulte M
    Zentralbl Chir; 1992; 117(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 1574945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metastatic disease of the femur.
    Wilkins RM; Sim FH; Springfield DS
    Orthopedics; 1992 May; 15(5):621-30. PubMed ID: 1589354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Massive resection and prosthetic replacement for the treatment of metastases of the trochanteric and subtrochanteric femoral region bipolar arthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty.
    Haentjens P; de Neve W; Casteleyn PP; Opdecam P
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1993; 59 Suppl 1():367-71. PubMed ID: 8116432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What Are the Functional Results and Complications With Long Stem Hemiarthroplasty in Patients With Metastases to the Proximal Femur?
    Peterson JR; Decilveo AP; O'Connor IT; Golub I; Wittig JC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):745-756. PubMed ID: 27052019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Characteristics of the hip joint prosthesis (a review of the literature)].
    Kulish NI; Tan'kut VA
    Ortop Travmatol Protez; 1981 Mar; (3):64-70. PubMed ID: 7015227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revision total hip arthroplasty with the BIAS (Biologic Ingrowth Anatomic System) femoral component. Three to six-year results.
    Hussamy O; Lachiewicz PF
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1994 Aug; 76(8):1137-48. PubMed ID: 8056794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reconstructions after resections of tumors involving the proximal femur.
    Johnson ME; Mankin HJ
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1991 Jan; 22(1):87-103. PubMed ID: 1992437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effect of substance and length of intramedullary implant rods of special tumor prostheses on bone canal].
    Steinhauser E; Rechl H; Schaff P; Gradinger R
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1998; 43 Suppl():378-9. PubMed ID: 9859407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Study of 100 total arthroplasties of the hip with femoral megaprosthesis after extensive resection of the upper end of the femur].
    Katzner M; Schvingt E
    Int Orthop; 1982; 6(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 7183575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty in allograft-prosthesis composite reconstruction of the proximal femur following primary bone tumour resection.
    Jamshidi K; Mirkazemi M; Gharedaghi M; Izanloo A; Mohammadpour M; Pisoudeh K; Bagherifard A; Mirzaei A
    Bone Joint J; 2020 Apr; 102-B(4):524-529. PubMed ID: 32228068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Alloplastic replacement of the proximal femur--indications, results and experiences].
    Maurer KP; Refior HJ
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1996; 134(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 8650992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acrylic cement stabilized joint replacements.
    Urist MR
    Curr Probl Surg; 1975 Nov; ():1-54. PubMed ID: 803182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Pathological fractures of the proximal femur end].
    Friedl W
    Zentralbl Chir; 1995; 120(11):873-80. PubMed ID: 8533482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bony atrophy after mega total hip replacement for bone tumors. 11 cases followed for 3-15 years.
    Franzén H; Carlsson A; Johnsson R; Rydholm A; Onnerfält R
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1994 Oct; 65(5):513-6. PubMed ID: 7801752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Tumour prosthesis in the treatment of metastases, loosening of prosthesis and fractures at the proximal femur (author's transl)].
    Wunderlich T; Blümlein H; Steeger D
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1980; 118(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 7424108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functional evaluation of megaprostheses replacing the proximal femur.
    Gebhart M; Mainil-Varlet P; Aerens C
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1993; 59 Suppl 1():47-51. PubMed ID: 8116439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Reconstructive interventions on the hip joint for tumors of proximal part of the femur].
    Dedkov AG
    Klin Khir; 2010 Jan; (1):40-2. PubMed ID: 20469693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.