These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3974127)

  • 1. Interaction of left ventricular contraction and aortic input impedance in experimental and clinical studies.
    Yaginuma T; Noda T; Tsuchiya M; Takazawa K; Tanaka H; Kotoda K; Hosoda S
    Jpn Circ J; 1985 Feb; 49(2):206-14. PubMed ID: 3974127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Responses of left ventricle to changes in aortic input impedance.
    Ishide N; Maruyama Y; Isoyama S; Nishioka O; Takishima T
    Jpn Circ J; 1985 Feb; 49(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 3974128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Left ventricular afterload and aortic input impedance: implications of pulsatile blood flow.
    Nichols WW; Pepine CJ
    Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 1982; 24(4):293-306. PubMed ID: 7054858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Propofol alters left ventricular afterload as evaluated by aortic input impedance in dogs.
    Lowe D; Hettrick DA; Pagel PS; Warltier DC
    Anesthesiology; 1996 Feb; 84(2):368-76. PubMed ID: 8602668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determinants of isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly.
    Nichols WW; Nicolini FA; Pepine CJ
    J Hypertens Suppl; 1992 Aug; 10(6):S73-7. PubMed ID: 1432333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Aortic input impedance during nitroprusside infusion. A reconsideration of afterload reduction and beneficial action.
    Pepine CJ; Nichols WW; Curry RC; Conti CR
    J Clin Invest; 1979 Aug; 64(2):643-54. PubMed ID: 457874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Role of aortic input impedance in the decreased cardiovascular response to exercise with aging in dogs.
    Yin FC; Weisfeldt ML; Milnor WR
    J Clin Invest; 1981 Jul; 68(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 7251864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of age on ventricular-vascular coupling.
    Nichols WW; O'Rourke MF; Avolio AP; Yaginuma T; Murgo JP; Pepine CJ; Conti CR
    Am J Cardiol; 1985 Apr; 55(9):1179-84. PubMed ID: 3984897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Manipulation of ascending aortic pressure and flow wave reflections with the Valsalva maneuver: relationship to input impedance.
    Murgo JP; Westerhof N; Giolma JP; Altobelli SA
    Circulation; 1981 Jan; 63(1):122-32. PubMed ID: 7438386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vascular load defined by the aortic input impedance spectrum.
    Nichols WW; Pepine CJ; Geiser EA; Conti CR
    Fed Proc; 1980 Feb; 39(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 7353677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of exercise on aortic input impedance and pressure wave forms in normal humans.
    Murgo JP; Westerhof N; Giolma JP; Altobelli SA
    Circ Res; 1981 Mar; 48(3):334-43. PubMed ID: 7460206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of extraanatomic bypass on aortic input impedance studied in open chest dogs. Should the vascular prosthesis be compliant to unload the left ventricle?
    Morita S; Kuboyama I; Asou T; Tokunaga K; Nose Y; Nakamura M; Harasawa Y; Sunagawa K
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 Nov; 102(5):774-83. PubMed ID: 1834892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noninvasive determination of aortic input impedance and external left ventricular power output: a validation and repeatability study of a new technique.
    Kelly R; Fitchett D
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Oct; 20(4):952-63. PubMed ID: 1527307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inelastic vascular prosthesis for proximal aorta increases pulsatile arterial load and causes left ventricular hypertrophy in dogs.
    Morita S; Asou T; Kuboyama I; Harasawa Y; Sunagawa K; Yasui H
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 124(4):768-74. PubMed ID: 12324735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Left ventricular wall stress and aortic input impedance.
    Covell JW; Pouleur H; Ross J
    Fed Proc; 1980 Feb; 39(2):202-7. PubMed ID: 7353678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of nifedipine on systemic hydraulic vascular load in patients with hypertension.
    Chang KC; Hsieh KS; Kuo TS; Chen HI
    Cardiovasc Res; 1990 Sep; 24(9):719-26. PubMed ID: 2224939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Arterial compliance and wave reflection.
    O'Rourke M
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1991 Sep; 84 Spec No 3():45-8. PubMed ID: 1953285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of changes in the aortic input impedance on systolic pressure-ejected volume relationships in the isolated supported canine left ventricle.
    Ishide N; Shimizu Y; Maruyama Y; Koiwa Y; Nunokawa T; Isoyama S; Kitaoka S; Tamaki K; Ino-Oka E; Takishima T
    Cardiovasc Res; 1980 Apr; 14(4):229-43. PubMed ID: 7427971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ventricular/vascular interaction in patients with mild systemic hypertension and normal peripheral resistance.
    Nichols WW; O'Rourke MF; Avolio AP; Yaginuma T; Pepine CJ; Conti CR
    Circulation; 1986 Sep; 74(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 3742748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Left ventricle-aortic coupling: prediction of contraction pattern.
    Piene H; Myhre ES
    Am J Physiol; 1984 Oct; 247(4 Pt 2):H531-40. PubMed ID: 6496699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.