These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3974214)
1. Alaryngeal speech intelligibility and the older listener. Clark JG J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 Feb; 50(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 3974214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of audio-visual information on the intelligibility of alaryngeal speech. Evitts PM; Portugal L; Van Dine A; Holler A J Commun Disord; 2010; 43(2):92-104. PubMed ID: 20005524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of listener sophistication on judgements of tracheoesophageal talker intelligibility. Doyle PC; Swift ER; Haaf RG J Commun Disord; 1989 Apr; 22(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 2723141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of three modes of alaryngeal speech with a synthetic sentence identification (SSI) task in varying message-to-competition ratios. Clark JG; Stemple JC J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Sep; 25(3):333-8. PubMed ID: 7176604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An acoustical and perceptual study of vowels produced by alaryngeal speakers of Cantonese. Ng ML; Chu R Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 19299898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speaking proficiency variations according to method of alaryngeal voicing. Williams SE; Watson JB Laryngoscope; 1987 Jun; 97(6):737-9. PubMed ID: 3586817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech performance of adult cantonese-speaking laryngectomees using different types of alaryngeal phonation. Ng ML; Kwok CL; Chow SF J Voice; 1997 Sep; 11(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 9297679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of the Lombard Effect in Improving Alaryngeal Speech. Ng ML J Voice; 2021 Jan; 35(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 31350113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effect of Clear Speech on Cantonese Alaryngeal Speakers' Intelligibility. Hui TF; Cox SR; Huang T; Chen WR; Ng ML Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2022; 74(2):103-111. PubMed ID: 34333487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perception of stop consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers. Gomyo Y; Doyle PC J Otolaryngol; 1989 Jun; 18(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 2739001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the speech acceptability of good and excellent esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers. Trudeau MD J Commun Disord; 1987 Feb; 20(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 3819002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Individual speaker influence on relative intelligibility of esophageal speech and artificial larynx speech. Kalb MB; Carpenter MA J Speech Hear Disord; 1981 Feb; 46(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 7206682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Listeners' perceptions of consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal talkers. Doyle PC; Danhauer JL; Reed CG J Speech Hear Disord; 1988 Nov; 53(4):400-7. PubMed ID: 3184901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acceptability ratings and intelligibility scores of alaryngeal speakers by three listener groups. Bridges A Br J Disord Commun; 1991 Dec; 26(3):325-35. PubMed ID: 1814417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effects of Contextual Priming and Alaryngeal Speech Mode on Auditory-Perceptual Ratings of Listener Comfort. Failla S; Al-Zanoon N; Smith N; Doyle PC J Voice; 2021 Nov; 35(6):934.e17-934.e23. PubMed ID: 32278613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A sindscal analysis of perceptual features for consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal talkers. Doyle PC; Danhauer JL; Mendel LL J Speech Hear Disord; 1990 Nov; 55(4):756-60. PubMed ID: 2232755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptual and acoustical analysis of alaryngeal speech: determinants of intelligibility. Drummond S; Dancer J; Krueger K; Spring G Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Dec; 83(3 Pt 1):801-2. PubMed ID: 8961316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of speech using artificial larynx and tracheoesophageal puncture with valve in the same speaker. Merwin GE; Goldstein LP; Rothman HB Laryngoscope; 1985 Jun; 95(6):730-4. PubMed ID: 3999908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perception of intonational contrasts in alaryngeal speech. Gandour J; Weinberg B J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Mar; 26(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 6865370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Listener impressions of alaryngeal communication modalities. Knollhoff SM; Borrie SA; Barrett TS; Searl JP Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2021 Oct; 23(5):540-547. PubMed ID: 33501872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]