These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3974421)

  • 1. Defective newborns and government intermeddling.
    Smith GP
    Med Sci Law; 1985 Jan; 25(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 3974421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The antiabortion movement and Baby Jane Doe.
    Paige C; Karnofsky EB
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):255-69. PubMed ID: 3745839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 'Baby Doe' rulings-review and comment.
    Britton JR
    West J Med; 1984 Feb; 140(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 6730486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Civil rights and regulatory wrongs: the Reagan administration and the medical treatment of handicapped infants.
    Brown LD
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):231-54. PubMed ID: 3745838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The case of Baby Jane Doe. 2. Baby Jane Doe in the courts.
    Steinbock B
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Feb; 14(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 6232243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The survival of Baby Doe.
    Lancet; 1984 Jan; 1(8370):215. PubMed ID: 11644275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survival at what cost? Origins and effects of the modern controversy on treating severely handicapped newborns.
    Reiser SJ
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):199-213. PubMed ID: 3745836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Court overturns 'Baby Doe' rule.
    Sci News; 1983 Apr; 123(18):286. PubMed ID: 11653489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Government intercedes in "Baby Jane Doe".
    Holden C
    Science; 1983 Nov; 222(4626):908. PubMed ID: 6227081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reporting the case of Baby Jane Doe.
    Kerr K
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Aug; 14(4):7-9. PubMed ID: 6237076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
    Horan DJ; Balch BJ
    Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Baby Jane Doe ruling upheld; suit fails.
    Curran M
    Ob Gyn News; 1983 Dec 15-31; 18(24):8. PubMed ID: 11653509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beyond state intervention in the family: for Baby Jane Doe.
    Minow M
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1985; 18(4):933-1014. PubMed ID: 11655183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selective nontreatment of handicapped newborns: an analysis.
    Crossley MA
    Med Law; 1987; 6(6):499-524. PubMed ID: 2959834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Legal aspects of withholding treatment from handicapped newborns: substantive issues.
    Robertson JA
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):215-30. PubMed ID: 3745837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. U.S. seeks records of 'Baby Jane Doe'.
    Barringer F
    Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11646368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The treatment of handicapped newborns: is there a role for law?
    Burt RA
    Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):279-91. PubMed ID: 11651814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 'Baby Doe' proposed reg suffers setback in court.
    Med World News; 1983 Dec; 24(23):27. PubMed ID: 11645566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Judge rejects U.S. role in 'Baby Doe' case.
    Barringer F
    Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():A33. PubMed ID: 11646343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 'Baby Jane' ruling appealed by Justice.
    Barringer F
    Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():A5. PubMed ID: 11646367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.