These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3974612)

  • 21. Statistical methods to decide whether mutagenicity test data from Drosophila assays indicate a positive, negative, or inconclusive result.
    Frei H; Würgler FE
    Mutat Res; 1988 Aug; 203(4):297-308. PubMed ID: 3136327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Finding differentially expressed genes in high dimensional data: Rank based test statistic via a distance measure.
    Mathur S; Sadana A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Dec; 24(6):968-79. PubMed ID: 22240308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Genotoxicity of 1,3-butadiene and its epoxy intermediates.
    Walker VE; Walker DM; Meng Q; McDonald JD; Scott BR; Seilkop SK; Claffey DJ; Upton PB; Powley MW; Swenberg JA; Henderson RF;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Aug; (144):3-79. PubMed ID: 20017413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Statistical studies in genetic toxicology: a perspective from the U.S. National Toxicology Program.
    Margolin BH
    Environ Health Perspect; 1985 Nov; 63():187-94. PubMed ID: 4076083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Phenotypic instability of Salmonella typhimurium tester strains: statistical verification.
    McCoy EC; Pet-Edwards J; Chankong V; Rosenkranz HS
    Mutat Res; 1984 Jul; 127(2):185-8. PubMed ID: 6379430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A place for statistics in the generation and analysis of genetic toxicity data: a response to 'rodent mutation assay data presentation and statistical assessment'.
    Carr GJ; Gorelick NJ
    Mutat Res; 1996 Oct; 357(1-2):257-60. PubMed ID: 8876702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Statistical methods for short-term tests in genetic toxicology: the first fifteen years.
    Edler L
    Mutat Res; 1992 Jul; 277(1):11-33. PubMed ID: 1376440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The use of historical data for identifying biologically unimportant but statistically significant results in genotoxicity assays.
    Mitchell ID; Rees RW; Gilbert PJ; Carlton JB
    Mutagenesis; 1990 Mar; 5(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 2188068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The use of historical control information in testing for a trend in Poisson means.
    Tarone RE
    Biometrics; 1982 Jun; 38(2):457-62. PubMed ID: 7115873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The mouse specific-locus test with agents other than radiations: interpretation of data and recommendations for future work.
    Russell LB; Selby PB; von Halle E; Sheridan W; Valcovic L
    Mutat Res; 1981 May; 86(3):329-54. PubMed ID: 7029264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A proposed method for assembly and interpretation of short-term test data.
    Brusick D
    Environ Health Perspect; 1991 Dec; 96():101-11. PubMed ID: 1820250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Statistics Refresher for Molecular Imaging Technologists, Part 2: Accuracy of Interpretation, Significance, and Variance.
    Farrell MB
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2018 Jun; 46(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 29438006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Variance estimation in single-cell mutation assays: comparison to experimental observations in human lymphoblasts at 4 gene loci.
    Leong PM; Thilly WG; Morgenthaler S
    Mutat Res; 1985; 150(1-2):403-10. PubMed ID: 4000166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An appraisal of critical effect sizes for the benchmark dose approach to assess dose-response relationships in genetic toxicology.
    Zeller A; Duran-Pacheco G; Guérard M
    Arch Toxicol; 2017 Dec; 91(12):3799-3807. PubMed ID: 28799093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A statistical analysis of the third UKEMS collaborative trial.
    Green MH; Cook SK; Cole J; Arlett CF
    Mutagenesis; 1990; 5 Suppl():71-84. PubMed ID: 2184326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Statistical analysis of data in mutagenicity assays: rodent micronucleus assay.
    Hayashi M; Hashimoto S; Sakamoto Y; Hamada C; Sofuni T; Yoshimura I
    Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Jan; 102 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):49-52. PubMed ID: 8187724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analysis of mixed categorical data in 2 x K contingency tables.
    Gautam S
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(10):1471-84. PubMed ID: 12185897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A new statistical method for evaluation of L5178Ytk(+/-) mammalian cell mutation data using microwell method.
    Omori T; Honma M; Hayashi M; Honda Y; Yoshimura I
    Mutat Res; 2002 May; 517(1-2):199-208. PubMed ID: 12034321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Models and assumptions underlying genetic risk assessment.
    Sobels FH
    Mutat Res; 1989 May; 212(1):77-89. PubMed ID: 2725544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Study of the causes of direct-acting mutagenicity in coffee and tea using the Ara test in Salmonella typhimurium.
    Ariza RR; Dorado G; Barbancho M; Pueyo C
    Mutat Res; 1988 Sep; 201(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 3047575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.