These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3976832)

  • 1. Fixation disparity vs. binocular fixation misalignment.
    Remole A
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1985 Jan; 62(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 3976832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Objective measurement of binocular fixation misalignment.
    Remole A; Code SM; Matyas CE; McLeod MA; White DJ
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1986 Aug; 63(8):631-8. PubMed ID: 3766692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Binocular fixation misalignment measured by border enhancement: a simplified technique.
    Remole A
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1984 Feb; 61(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 6703006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Horizontal fixation disparity measures with nonius lines.
    Jaschinski W; Kloke WB; Jainta S; Buchholz J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 82(11):988-99. PubMed ID: 16317376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of nonius line and fusion lock parameters on fixation disparity.
    Ukwade MT
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 77(6):309-20. PubMed ID: 10879788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fixation disparity and nonius bias.
    Jaschinski W; Bröde P; Griefahn B
    Vision Res; 1999 Feb; 39(3):669-77. PubMed ID: 10341993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Border enhancement as a function of binocular fixation performance.
    Remole A
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1983 Jul; 60(7):567-77. PubMed ID: 6614133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual objective versus subjective fixation disparity as a function of forced vergence.
    Jaschinski W
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0199958. PubMed ID: 29980146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Fixation disparity with the Pola pointing test: not representative for eye position under natural viewing conditions].
    Gerling J; Ball M; Bömer T; Bach M; Kommerell G
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1998 Apr; 212(4):226-33. PubMed ID: 9644669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of forced vergence on retinal correspondence.
    Fogt N; Jones R
    Vision Res; 1998 Sep; 38(18):2711-9. PubMed ID: 9775320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Uncertainty in the measurement of fixation disparity due to zones of perceived nonius alignment.
    Larson WL
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1982; 219(5):233-5. PubMed ID: 7160631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short-latency disparity vergence responses and their dependence on a prior saccadic eye movement.
    Busettini C; Miles FA; Krauzlis RJ
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Apr; 75(4):1392-410. PubMed ID: 8727386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relation between fixation disparity and the asymmetry between convergent and divergent disparity step responses.
    Jaschinski W; Svede A; Jainta S
    Vision Res; 2008 Jan; 48(2):253-63. PubMed ID: 18164741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Topical Review: Methodological Variables in Clinical and Laboratory Measurements of Fixation Disparity.
    Fogt N
    Optom Vis Sci; 2023 Aug; 100(8):572-594. PubMed ID: 37436811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring vergence and fixation disparity in 3D space.
    Duchesne J; Coubard OA
    Eur J Neurosci; 2021 Mar; 53(5):1473-1486. PubMed ID: 32745341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Objective vs subjective measures of fixation disparity for short and long fixation periods.
    Jaschinski W; Jainta S; Kloke WB
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Jul; 30(4):379-90. PubMed ID: 20629960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation: effects of stimulus spatial frequency and eccentricity.
    Cisarik PM; Harwerth RS
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 May; 160(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 15836903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual Objective and Subjective Fixation Disparity in Near Vision.
    Jaschinski W
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170190. PubMed ID: 28135308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subjective fixation disparity affected by dynamic asymmetry, resting vergence, and nonius bias.
    Svede A; Hoormann J; Jainta S; Jaschinski W
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jun; 52(7):4356-61. PubMed ID: 21467184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of vertical prism imbalance on fixation performance.
    Remole A
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1987 Dec; 64(12):916-24. PubMed ID: 3445887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.