These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3976838)

  • 1. Three-way comparison of retinoscopy, subjective, and Dioptron Nova refractive findings.
    Grosvenor T; Perrigin DM; Perrigin J
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1985 Jan; 62(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 3976838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Dioptron Nova refractive data with conventional refractive data.
    Perrigin DM; Grosvenor T; Reis A; Perrigin J
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1984 Jul; 61(7):479-83. PubMed ID: 6465281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic refraction and the private ophthalmologist: Dioptron II compared with subjective examination.
    Mailer CM
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1978 Oct; 13(4):252-7. PubMed ID: 743607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Accuracy of three common optometry methods in examination of refraction in juveniles].
    Su T; Min X; Liu S; Li F; Tan X; Zhong Y; Deng S
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Feb; 41(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 26932216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dioptron-and retinoscopy-subjective discrepancies: effect of age.
    French CN; Nixon JA; Wood IC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1982; 2(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 7177649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of American optical SR-IV refractive data with clinical refractive data on a group of myopic children.
    Grosvenor T; Perrigin DM; Perrigin J
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1983 Mar; 60(3):224-35. PubMed ID: 6846497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An automatic objective optometer. Description and clinical evaluation.
    Polse DA; Kerr KE
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1975 Mar; 93(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 1094996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The dioptron II's validity and reliability as a function of its three accuracy indices.
    French CN; Wood IC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1982; 2(1):57-74. PubMed ID: 7088557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Studies of an automatic refraction machine.
    Drance SM; Mitchell DW; Schulzer M
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1975 Oct; 10(4):462-8. PubMed ID: 1192266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of a traditional and wavefront autorefraction.
    Lebow KA; Campbell CE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1191-8. PubMed ID: 25198541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Objective refraction: comparison of retinoscopy and automated techniques.
    Berman M; Nelson P; Caden B
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1984 Mar; 61(3):204-9. PubMed ID: 6720868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Clinical evaluation of the Dioptron II Ultima B].
    Risse JF; Villard C; Carre H
    Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1983 Oct; 83(10):1179-84. PubMed ID: 6679824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Usefulness of refractive measurement of wavefront autorefraction in patients with difficult retinoscopy.
    Kinori M; Gomi CF; Ondeck CL; Schanzlin DJ; Robbins SL; Granet DB
    J AAPOS; 2016 Dec; 20(6):493-495.e1. PubMed ID: 27815189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Value and reliability of an automatic objective refractometer: the Dioptron Nova. A statistical study on computer of 600 measures].
    Poletti J; Courrejou C
    Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1985 Apr; 85(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 3830459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of noncycloplegic refraction in primary school children in southern Thailand.
    Funarunart P; Tengtrisorn S; Sangsupawanich P; Siangyai P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Jun; 92(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 19530586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a clinical aberrometer for lower-order accuracy and repeatability, higher-order repeatability, and instrument myopia.
    Salmon TO; van de Pol C
    Optometry; 2005 Aug; 76(8):461-72. PubMed ID: 16150413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of "near retinoscopy" and subjective refraction in adults.
    Mohindra I
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1977 May; 54(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 900252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Self-refraction accuracy with adjustable spectacles among children in Ghana.
    Ilechie AA; Abokyi S; Owusu-Ansah A; Boadi-Kusi SB; Denkyira AK; Abraham CH
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Apr; 92(4):456-63. PubMed ID: 25785535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of objective refraction in darkness to cycloplegic refraction: a pilot study.
    Vasudevan B; Ciuffreda KJ; Meehan K; Grk D; Cox M
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Mar; 99(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 26888570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of photorefraction and retinoscopy in children.
    Erdurmus M; Yagci R; Karadag R; Durmus M
    J AAPOS; 2007 Dec; 11(6):606-11. PubMed ID: 17588794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.