These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3977019)

  • 1. Doctors can't split fees--why should lawyers?
    Lepore MJ
    Am J Dermatopathol; 1985 Feb; 7(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 3977019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Malpractice fee hikes mean some US MDs can't afford to work.
    Korcok M
    CMAJ; 2003 Feb; 168(4):472. PubMed ID: 12591802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cap on lawyers' fees for minor negligence claims could save NHS £45m a year.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():j542. PubMed ID: 28143812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contingency fees can silence a frivolous claim.
    Johnson LJ
    Med Econ; 2008 Nov; 85(22):48. PubMed ID: 19130716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Malpractice insurance rates reach boiling point. Physicians burned by lawyers, lawsuits and jury awards.
    Weber DO
    Physician Exec; 2002; 28(2):12-4. PubMed ID: 11957403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New directions in medical liability reform.
    Kachalia A; Mello MM
    N Engl J Med; 2011 Apr; 364(16):1564-72. PubMed ID: 21506746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Disclosing contingency fees.
    Fitzpatrick JM
    Med Econ; 2005 Jan; 82(2):88. PubMed ID: 15727345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When attorneys come back for seconds. Increased attorney fees for extraordinary work in medical malpractice cases.
    Kemp R
    J Leg Med; 2004 Mar; 25(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 15204915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Malpractice reform. Florida: round two.
    Guglielmo WJ
    Med Econ; 2007 Apr; 84(7):50, 53-4, 56. PubMed ID: 17494262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "Contingent fees" for lawyers.
    Bergen RP
    JAMA; 1974 Nov; 230(5):749-50. PubMed ID: 4408397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "The lawyers are running amok".
    Pennachio DL
    Med Econ; 2002 Aug; 79(15):60-1. PubMed ID: 12232918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medical malpractice and contingent fees.
    Rozovsky LE
    Hosp Trustee; 1978; 2(5):21-3. PubMed ID: 10239696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On frivolity and the malpractice cafeteria. A crisis contingent on lawyers' fees.
    Edwards FJ
    Group Pract J; 1989; 38(1):20-2, 24, 26. PubMed ID: 10292130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scrap contingency fees? Malpractice problems might get worse.
    Bradford EW
    Med Econ; 1992 Nov; 69(22):127-8, 130-1. PubMed ID: 10122545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why premiums are soaring again. A new "malpractice crisis"?
    Crane M
    Med Econ; 2001 Jul; 78(13):132-4, 137-8. PubMed ID: 11478169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What about a malpractice surcharge.
    Weiss GG
    Med Econ; 2004 Jul; 81(14):54-7. PubMed ID: 15357178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Health costs: we can't control what we can't see.
    Kridel RW
    Med Econ; 1984 Jan; 61(2):37, 40, 45 passim. PubMed ID: 10265384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Legal. Legal experiments.
    Haugh R
    Hosp Health Netw; 2005 Jul; 79(7):20, 22-3. PubMed ID: 16128312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Malpractice protection efforts seem to come up short.
    Manag Care; 2003 Nov; 12(11):18. PubMed ID: 14666582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Malpractice crisis: who profits from your premium?
    Zall M
    Med World News; 1987 Nov; 28(22):26-8, 30, 33-4. PubMed ID: 10284640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.