These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3977782)

  • 1. Hearing aid quality judgments in reverberant and nonreverberant environments using a magnitude estimation procedure.
    Harris RW; Goldstein DP
    Audiology; 1985; 24(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 3977782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of room reverberation upon hearing aid quality judgments.
    Harris RW; Goldstein DP
    Audiology; 1979; 18(3):253-62. PubMed ID: 464895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of low-frequency hearing aid response on four measures of speech perception.
    Tecca JE; Goldstein DP
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 6706023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
    Moore BC; Sęk A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subjective judgments of speech clarity measured by paired comparisons and category rating.
    Eisenberg LS; Dirks DD; Gornbein JA
    Ear Hear; 1997 Aug; 18(4):294-306. PubMed ID: 9288475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative evaluation of four hearing-aid selection procedures. II--Quality judgements as measures of benefit.
    Green R; Day S; Bamford J
    Br J Audiol; 1989 Aug; 23(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 2790304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Paired comparison judgments of relative intelligibility in noise.
    Studebaker GA; Bisset JD; Van Ort DM; Hoffnung SU
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Jul; 72(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 7108046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preference for and performance with damped and undamped hearing aids by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Davis LA; Davidson SA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Jun; 39(3):483-93. PubMed ID: 8783128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hearing Aids Benefit Recognition of Words in Emotional Speech but Not Emotion Identification.
    Goy H; Pichora-Fuller MK; Singh G; Russo FA
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518801736. PubMed ID: 30249171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?
    Smeds K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):159-72. PubMed ID: 15064661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of sound quality judgments for monaural and binaural hearing aid processed stimuli.
    Balfour PB; Hawkins DB
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):331-9. PubMed ID: 1487093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response time and percentage correct as measures of hearing aid performance.
    Seavertson JM; McLennan RO
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1983 Nov; 48(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 6645436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hearing aid evaluation: predicting speech gain from insertion gain.
    Dillon H
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Jun; 36(3):621-33. PubMed ID: 8331918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech-perception aids for hearing-impaired people: current status and needed research. Working Group on Communication Aids for the Hearing-Impaired.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Aug; 90(2 Pt 1):637-83. PubMed ID: 1939883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Semantic context improves speech intelligibility and reduces listening effort for listeners with hearing impairment.
    Holmes E; Folkeard P; Johnsrude IS; Scollie S
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jul; 57(7):483-492. PubMed ID: 29415585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multidimensional scaling of quality judgments of speech signals processed by hearing aids.
    Punch JL; Montgomery AA; Schwartz DM; Walden BE; Prosek RA; Howard MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Aug; 68(2):458-66. PubMed ID: 7419804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnitude estimation of loudness. III: Performance of selected hearing aid users.
    Margolis RH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Sep; 28(3):411-20. PubMed ID: 4046582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.