These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3978033)

  • 1. A computer simulation model for the practical planning of cervical cancer screening programmes.
    Parkin DM
    Br J Cancer; 1985 Apr; 51(4):551-68. PubMed ID: 3978033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of screening policies for cervical cancer in England and Wales using a computer simulation model.
    Parkin DM; Moss SM
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1986 Jun; 40(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 3746177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mass screening programmes and trends in cervical cancer in Finland and the Netherlands.
    van der Aa MA; Pukkala E; Coebergh JW; Anttila A; Siesling S
    Int J Cancer; 2008 Apr; 122(8):1854-8. PubMed ID: 18067129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening for cervical cancer.
    Mendis LN; Best JM; Taylor RW; Banatvala JE
    Lancet; 1979 Jul; 2(8135):193-4. PubMed ID: 89296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [To what extent have early cancer detection and preventive examination for cancer of the uterine cervix fulfilled established expectations?].
    Soost HJ; Lehmacher W; Ruffing-Kullmann B
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1989 Jun; 49(6):579-86. PubMed ID: 2787261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Twenty-three year's research on prevention of cervical cancer.
    Tao S; Lu HZ; Shen Y; Chen WZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1984 May; 97(5):379-84. PubMed ID: 6439492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incidence and prevalence of preclinical carcinoma of cervix in a British population.
    Parkin DM; Hodgson P; Clayden AD
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Jul; 89(7):564-70. PubMed ID: 7093172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Appropriateness of cervical cancer screening.
    Eddy DM
    Gynecol Oncol; 1981 Oct; 12(2 Pt 2):S168-87. PubMed ID: 7030879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a hospital based cytology screening programme for reduction in life time risk of cervical cancer.
    Agarwal SS; Murthy NS; Sharma S; Sharma KC; Das DK
    Neoplasma; 1995; 42(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 7617084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experience in screening for cervical cancer in rural areas of Barsi Tehsil (Maharashtra).
    Nene BM; Jayant K; Malvi SG; Dale PS; Deshpande R
    Indian J Cancer; 1994 Mar; 31(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 8063335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mathematical models and natural history in cervical cancer screening.
    Prorok PC
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):185-98. PubMed ID: 3570404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of a hospital based cytology screening program.
    Das DK; Murthy NS; Bhatnager P; Juneja A; Sharma S; Pant JN; Bhatt NC; Sharma KC; Luthra UK
    Neoplasma; 1992; 39(6):381-4. PubMed ID: 1491729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mortality from carcinoma of cervix uteri in Britain.
    Macgregor JE; Teper S
    Lancet; 1978 Oct; 2(8093):774-6. PubMed ID: 80695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Duration of preclinical cervical cancer and reduction in incidence of invasive cancer following negative pap smears.
    van Oortmarssen GJ; Habbema JD
    Int J Epidemiol; 1995 Apr; 24(2):300-7. PubMed ID: 7635589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Secondary prevention of cervical cancer part 1: screening for cervical cancer and its precursors.
    Boisen M; Diedrich JT; Lonky NM; Guido R
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jun; 57(2):279-91. PubMed ID: 24785416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mothers' screening histories influence daughters' vaccination uptake: an analysis of linked cervical screening and human papillomavirus vaccination records in the North West of England.
    Spencer Nee Pilkington AM; Brabin L; Verma A; Roberts SA
    Eur J Cancer; 2013 Apr; 49(6):1264-72. PubMed ID: 23290788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical screening in England and Wales: its effect has been underestimated.
    Herbert A
    Cytopathology; 2000 Dec; 11(6):471-9. PubMed ID: 11194078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Problems in the construction and interpretation of screening programmes.
    Stormby N
    Tumori; 1976; 62(3):335. PubMed ID: 1014130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cancer prevention in primary care. Screening for cervical cancer.
    Austoker J
    BMJ; 1994 Jul; 309(6949):241-8. PubMed ID: 7980803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of screening on cervical cancer mortality in England and Wales: analysis of trends with an age period cohort model.
    Sasieni P; Adams J
    BMJ; 1999 May; 318(7193):1244-5. PubMed ID: 10231253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.