These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3979172)
41. Intrauterine devices. Their role in family planning care. WHO Offset Publ; 1983; (75):1-53. PubMed ID: 6637075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. A comparative study of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system Mirena versus the Copper T380A intrauterine device during lactation: breast-feeding performance, infant growth and infant development. Shaamash AH; Sayed GH; Hussien MM; Shaaban MM Contraception; 2005 Nov; 72(5):346-51. PubMed ID: 16246660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Pregnancy and the intrauterine device. Viollet MF Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1977; 5(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 12335126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Insertion of intrauterine devices in the early postpartum period. Diamond RA; Freeman DW Minn Med; 1973 Jan; 56(1):49-50. PubMed ID: 4682589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. [Intrauterine contraception: new devices, new applications]. Batár I Orv Hetil; 2003 Feb; 144(7):307-12. PubMed ID: 12666377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Fertility regulation in nursing women. II. Comparative performance of progesterone implants versus placebo and copper T. Croxatto HB; Díaz S; Peralta O; Juez G; Casado ME; Salvatierra AM; Durán E Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Sep; 144(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 7114130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Do copper containing intrauterine contraceptive devices need to be changed after 2 years? Dunn K; Kovacs GT Clin Reprod Fertil; 1983 Dec; 2(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 6678604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Random comparative study between intrauterine device Multiload Cu375 and TCu 380a inserted in the postpartum period]. Lara Ricalde R; Menocal Tobías G; Ramos Pérez C; Velázquez Ramírez N Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2006 Jun; 74(6):306-11. PubMed ID: 16970116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Insertion and removal of intrauterine devices. Johnson BA Am Fam Physician; 2005 Jan; 71(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 15663031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The Mexican experience with postpartum-postabortion programs, 1970-1972. Keller A; Rabago de Rodriguez A; Correu S Stud Fam Plann; 1974 Jun; 5(6):195-200. PubMed ID: 4842692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. [Intrauterine contraception]. Reigstad A Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1976 Jan; 96(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 1257950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. [Post partum application of ML Cu 250 intrauterine device. Preliminary report]. Ruíz Velasco V; Meza Vargas M; Goldsmith A Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1979 May; 45(271):359-69. PubMed ID: 540772 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Clinical experience with copper intrauterine devices in an urban family practice unit. Microys GI Prim Care; 1978 Dec; 5(4):709-15. PubMed ID: 253368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Clinical experience with intrauterine devices as a means of contraception in Kanawha County, West Virginia. Mahmoodian S W V Med J; 1976 Jul; 72(7):170-4. PubMed ID: 1067683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Insertion of the Lippes loop in the immediate postpartum patient: comparison with later insertions. Halbert DR; Christakos AC; Lang VB South Med J; 1971 Jun; 64(6):707-10. PubMed ID: 5089145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Puerperal insertion of the Dalkon shield: a private practice experience. Draper B; White EF Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1973 Jan; 115(2):278-9. PubMed ID: 4691851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Use of intrauterine contraceptive devices in the postpartum period. Zerzavy FM Am J Public Health Nations Health; 1967 Jan; 57(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 6066707 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]