These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 397964)

  • 1. Comparative photoelastic stress analysis of four blade-type endosteal implants.
    Vajda TT; Fung JY
    J Oral Implantol; 1979; 8(2):257-69. PubMed ID: 397964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Photoelastic studies of the stress distributions on blade-type endosteal dental implants.
    Munir ZA; Richards LW; Prado ME
    Oral Implantol; 1975; 5(3):296-332. PubMed ID: 1073441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endosteal blade-vent implants.
    Babbush CA
    Dent Clin North Am; 1980 Jul; 24(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 6995176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stress distribution caused by blade type dental implants.
    Farah JW; Craig RG; Yapp RA
    Implantologist; 1979 Mar; 1(4):82-5. PubMed ID: 296139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Success and survivability of endosteal blade implants managed in the practice of Dr. Linkow.
    Aceveco AI
    J Oral Implantol; 1987; 13(3):488-91. PubMed ID: 3334677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional finite element analysis of a blade implant.
    Ismail YH; Pahountis LN; Fleming JF
    Int J Oral Implantol; 1987; 4(2):25-31. PubMed ID: 3269833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical analysis of Linkow blade vent implants.
    Dahl GS
    J Oral Implantol; 1983; 11(1):89-92. PubMed ID: 6368847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endosteal blade-vent implants.
    Babbush CA
    Dent Clin North Am; 1986 Jan; 30(1):97-115. PubMed ID: 3514295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparative experiments on single tooth implants and blade implants of A12O3 ceramic].
    Ehrl PA
    Osterr Z Stomatol; 1983 Mar; 80(3):97-102. PubMed ID: 6350988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Photoelastic model studies on environmental stress of functionally loaded endosseous dental implants].
    Häfer M; Knöfler W
    Stomatol DDR; 1985 Aug; 35(8):461-7. PubMed ID: 3914108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Surgical problems with blade-shaped intraosseous implants].
    Jandl P
    Prakt Zubn Lek; 1987 Mar; 35(2):33-6. PubMed ID: 3306647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Clinical experience with titanium implants of the "Leipzig" type with special consideration of prosthetic aspects].
    Gitt I; Graf HL; Clauss H; Kirchberg J
    Stomatol DDR; 1987 Nov; 37(11):664-70. PubMed ID: 3331047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endosteal blade implants with tricalcium phosphate--a technique for a more predictable prognosis.
    Hoexter DL
    N Y J Dent; 1986 Nov; 56(6):214-20. PubMed ID: 3534659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship between endosteal implant design and function: maximum stress distribution with computer-formed, three dimensional Flexi-Cup blades.
    Valen M
    J Oral Implantol; 1983; 11(1):49-71. PubMed ID: 6368845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stress analysis of blade implant--mechanical properties of implant materials and stress distribution.
    Suetsugu T; Kitoh M; Murakami Y
    J Oral Implantol; 1979; 8(3):380-92. PubMed ID: 297794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Theory of endosteal-subperiosteal implants.
    Yamane T
    Implantologist; 1977 Mar; 1(2):150-5. PubMed ID: 369987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stress analysis of single-tooth implants. II. Effect of implant root-length variation and pseudo periodontal ligament incorporation.
    Atmaram GH; Mohammed H
    Implantologist; 1983-1984; 3(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 6386669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stress analysis of single-tooth implants. I. Effect of elastic parameters and geometry of implant.
    Atmaram GH; Mohammed H
    Implantologist; 1983-1984; 3(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 6386667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Principles and treatment planning considerations for successful endosteal blade implantology (I).
    Judy KW; Weiss CM
    Quintessence Int Dent Dig; 1978 Dec; 9(12):9-13. PubMed ID: 397517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implant prostheses. Blade vs. cantilever--clinical trial.
    Schnitman P; Rubenstein JE; Jeffcoat MK; Bertolami CN; Koch GC; Shulman LB
    J Oral Implantol; 1986; 12(3):449-59. PubMed ID: 3550114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.