These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3979998)

  • 1. Atlanta coalition tackles UR.
    Powills S
    Hospitals; 1985 Apr; 59(8):120-2. PubMed ID: 3979998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Atlanta experience. The Coalition.
    Felder LH
    Internist; 1985 Feb; 26(2):13-4. PubMed ID: 10270280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Atlanta hospitals.
    Urban Health; 1978 Sep; 7(7):37-42. PubMed ID: 10239625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. St. Louis businesses start review program.
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1985 Feb; 39(8):12-3. PubMed ID: 10270075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Private enterprise and provider participation spell success in cost containment.
    Hosmer DM
    Trustee; 1985 May; 38(5):28-30. PubMed ID: 10271701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancing utilization review program results.
    Martin M; Milstein A; Loveland DV
    Health Cost Manage; 1988; 5(2):10-6. PubMed ID: 10286636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. UR oversight may ease provider woes.
    Weisman E
    Hospitals; 1990 Mar; 64(6):82. PubMed ID: 2307436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Providers face business of growing private UR.
    Richards G
    Hosp Med Staff; 1984 Mar; 13(3):16-22. PubMed ID: 10266233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maximizing UR and QA resources through innovative models of practice.
    Zoebelein E
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1984 Aug; 10(8):253-5. PubMed ID: 6433300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Managing health care cuts hospitalization.
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1985 Mar; 39(9):32, 34, 36. PubMed ID: 10270078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of inpatient utilization to optimal standards.
    Dymowski RJ
    Manag Care Q; 1997; 5(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 10164648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is private sector UR cutting too close to the bone?
    Milstein A; Oehm M; Ludwig J; Berger P; Whittington K
    QA Rev; 1991 Mar; 3(2):3. PubMed ID: 10114859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review organizations: implications for discharge planning.
    Granitir T
    Disch Plann Update; 1985; 5(3):4-10. PubMed ID: 10273644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Watching practice patterns change.
    McCune SW
    South Hosp; 1992; 58(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 10116367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survival planning: utilization review and effective case management.
    Rosenstein AH
    Health Care Strateg Manage; 1987 Feb; 5(2):14-7. PubMed ID: 10281654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Utilization review in Maryland hospitals. A synopsis of the Maryland Insurance Administration's study.
    Thomas A
    Md Med; 2000; 1(3):20-2. PubMed ID: 10941242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hospital utilization review--an essential element in health care cost containment.
    Handel B
    Empl Benefits J; 1984 Sep; 9(3):8-12, 30. PubMed ID: 10273548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PURs (private utilization review organizations) raise serious problems, questions.
    Disch Plann Update; 1990; 10(4):1, 17-8. PubMed ID: 10105886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The hottest new thing in utilization review.
    Walter RS
    Med Econ; 1983 Feb; 60(4):177, 180-1. PubMed ID: 10273402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Business spurs UR growth. Hospitals are coming under increased scrutiny from outside utilization review.
    Richards G
    Hospitals; 1984 Mar; 58(5):96, 98-100. PubMed ID: 6538177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.