These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3980205)

  • 1. Imperiled newborns raise moral doubts.
    Bartholome WG
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Feb; 15(1):46-7. PubMed ID: 3980205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Imperiled newborns.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Dec; 17(6):5-32. PubMed ID: 2962968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mortality and parenting: an ethical framework for decisions about the treatment of imperiled newborns.
    Blustein J
    Theor Med; 1988 Feb; 9(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 3368883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Better to kill.
    Aiken W
    Westminst Inst Rev; 1982 Apr; 1(4):10-2. PubMed ID: 11650538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Euthanasia.
    Williams G
    Med Leg J; 1973; 41(Part 1):14-34. PubMed ID: 11664249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Terminating treatment for newborns: a theological perspective.
    Paris JJ
    Law Med Health Care; 1982 Jun; 10(3):120-4, 144. PubMed ID: 6920536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pharmacologic paralysis and withdrawal of mechanical ventilation at the end of life.
    Truog RD; Burns JP; Mitchell C; Johnson J; Robinson W
    N Engl J Med; 2000 Feb; 342(7):508-11. PubMed ID: 10675435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beneficent euthanasia.
    Kohl M
    Humanist; 1974; 34(4):9-11. PubMed ID: 11661127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parents refuse to allow life-saving treatment for newborn: our moral obligation.
    Otten M
    Princet J Bioeth; 1998; 1(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 11657340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selective nontreatment of the terminally ill: an Orthodox moral perspective.
    Breck J
    St Vladmirs Theol Q; 1989; 33(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 11652573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A case against something that is not the case: the Groningen Protocol and the moral principle of non-maleficence.
    de Vries MC; Verhagen AA
    Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):29-31. PubMed ID: 19061105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On letting some babies die.
    Smith DH
    Stud Hastings Cent; 1974 May; 2(2):37-46. PubMed ID: 11661065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lessons from the Infant Doe case.
    O'Rourke KD
    Conn Med; 1983 Jul; 47(7):411-2. PubMed ID: 6884023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The sanctity of life, the quality of life and the new 'Baby Doe' law.
    Johnstone BV
    Linacre Q; 1985 Aug; 52(3):258-70. PubMed ID: 11649728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Life, death, and harm: staying within the boundaries of nonmaleficence.
    Woien S
    Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):31-2. PubMed ID: 19061106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When life becomes optional: a comment on Kevin O'Rourke's approach to forgoing life support.
    Mikochik SL
    Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 7829308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Why we kill the weak.
    Budziszewski J
    Hum Life Rev; 1997; 23(4):67-74. PubMed ID: 11656677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toward an ethic of ambiguity.
    Arras JD
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Apr; 14(2):25-33. PubMed ID: 6724882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. To kill or let die?
    Med J Aust; 1985 Aug; 143(4):170-1. PubMed ID: 4021911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Issues in health care meriting particular Christian concern--a priority issue: the severely defective newborn.
    Roy DJ
    Linacre Q; 1982 Feb; 49(1):60-80. PubMed ID: 11650521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.