These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3981412)

  • 1. Sterility test systems for product recovery.
    Gee LW; Harvey JM; Olson WP; Lee ML
    J Pharm Sci; 1985 Jan; 74(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 3981412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of membrane filtration for removal of diminutive bioburden organisms in pharmaceutical products and processes.
    Sundaram S; Auriemma M; Howard G; Brandwein H; Leo F
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 1999; 53(4):186-201. PubMed ID: 10754712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "Absolute" sterility and "absolute" freedom from particle contamination.
    Knapp JZ
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 1998; 52(4):173-81. PubMed ID: 9752713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Data Mining to Determine the Influence of Fluid Properties on the Integrity Test Values.
    Thome B; Joseph B; Dassu D; Gaerke J; McBurnie L; Dixit M; Stering M; Tomlinson S; Mills S; Ferrante S; Weitzmann C
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2020; 74(5):524-562. PubMed ID: 32467178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sterility testing of antimicrobial-containing injectable solutions prepared in the pharmacy.
    Akers MJ; Wright GE; Carlson KA
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1991 Nov; 48(11):2414-8. PubMed ID: 1746574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sterilizing filtration of liposome and related lipid-containing solutions: enhancing successful filter qualification.
    Folmsbee M; Moussourakis M
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2012; 66(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 22492601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preuse/Poststerilization Integrity Testing (PUPSIT): To Do or Not to Do?
    Gupta VS; Jindal J; Gupta A; Gupta NK
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2020; 74(3):301-308. PubMed ID: 31732690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Basics of sterile compounding: bubble point testing.
    Thoma L
    Int J Pharm Compd; 2014; 18(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 24881342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The incubation period in sterility testing.
    Bathgate H; Lazzari D; Cameron H; McKay D
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1993; 47(5):254-7. PubMed ID: 8263662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a device for monitoring sterility of injectable fluids.
    Mayhall CG; Pierpaoli PG; Hall GO; Thomas RB
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1981 Aug; 38(8):1148-50. PubMed ID: 6791498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sorption of bacterial endotoxin and retention of bacteria by positively charged membrane filters.
    van Doorne H
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1993; 47(5):192-8. PubMed ID: 8263658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Batch-swirl method for detoxification of isopropyl myristate used for sterility testing of oils and ointments: membrane selection.
    Placencia AM; Oxborrow GS; Danielson JW
    J Pharm Sci; 1982 Jun; 71(6):714-5. PubMed ID: 6808114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is the removal of microorganisms by filtration really a sterilization method?
    Wallhäusser KH
    J Parenter Drug Assoc; 1979; 33(3):156-70. PubMed ID: 256995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sterility testing of cell therapy products: parallel comparison of automated methods with a CFR-compliant method.
    Khuu HM; Patel N; Carter CS; Murray PR; Read EJ
    Transfusion; 2006 Dec; 46(12):2071-82. PubMed ID: 17176318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of the BacT/ALERTR 3D system for sterility testing of injectable products.
    Bugno A; Lira RS; Oliveira WA; Almodovar AA; Saes DP; Pinto Tde J
    Braz J Microbiol; 2015; 46(3):743-7. PubMed ID: 26413055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part III: bacterial challenge tests on 0.2/0.22 and 0.1 micron rated filter cartridges with Hydrogenophaga (formerly Pseudomonas) pseudoflava.
    Sundaram S; Eisenhuth J; Lewis M; Howard G; Brandwein H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2001; 55(6):393-416. PubMed ID: 11766824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sterile filtration under conditions of high pressure and bacterial challenge levels.
    Aicholtz P; Wilkins R; Gabler R
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1987; 41(4):117-20. PubMed ID: 3668753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maintenance of sterility in 1-mL polypropylene syringes.
    Gonzalez S; Miller D; Murphy SP
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2007 Sep; 64(18):1962-4. PubMed ID: 17823109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sterility testing of fat emulsions using membrane filtration and dimethyl sulfoxide.
    Placencia AM; Oxborrow GS; Danielson JW
    J Pharm Sci; 1982 Jun; 71(6):704-5. PubMed ID: 7097539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the Effect of the Volume Throughput and Maximum Flux of Low-Surface-Tension Fluids on Bacterial Penetration of 0.2 Micron-Rated Filters during Process-Specific Filter Validation Testing.
    Folmsbee M
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2015; 69(2):307-16. PubMed ID: 25868996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.