These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3981603)

  • 1. Assessment of Hitachi HME-20 pulse and blood-pressure monitor.
    Northcote RJ; O'Donoghue J; Ballantyne D
    J Med Eng Technol; 1985; 9(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 3981603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated blood pressure reading--its claims and its reliability.
    Ho TF; Yip WC; Tay JS
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 1983 Oct; 12(4):606-8. PubMed ID: 6678140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of the DS-175, DS-145, and DS-115, digital blood pressure/pulse meter devices.
    Crews WD; Harrison DW
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1991; 25(3):211-4. PubMed ID: 1855106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simulation study of the consistency of oscillometric blood pressure measurements with and without artefacts.
    Amoore JN
    Blood Press Monit; 2000 Apr; 5(2):69-79. PubMed ID: 10828893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the non-invasive Nexfin® monitor with conventional methods for the measurement of arterial blood pressure in moderate risk orthopaedic surgery patients.
    Balzer F; Habicher M; Sander M; Sterr J; Scholz S; Feldheiser A; Müller M; Perka C; Treskatsch S
    J Int Med Res; 2016 Aug; 44(4):832-43. PubMed ID: 27142436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors affecting the validity of the standard blood pressure cuff.
    Stolt M; Sjönell G; Aström H; Hansson L
    Clin Physiol; 1993 Nov; 13(6):611-20. PubMed ID: 8119055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of the Accutracker II ambulatory blood pressure monitor: assessment of performance in two countries and comparison with sphygmomanometry and intra-arterial blood pressure at rest and during exercise.
    White WB; Lund-Johansen P; McCabe EJ; Omvik P
    J Hypertens; 1989 Dec; 7(12):967-75. PubMed ID: 2628497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of portable noninvasive blood pressure monitoring devices: comparisons with intra-arterial and sphygmomanometer measurements.
    Graettinger WF; Lipson JL; Cheung DG; Weber MA
    Am Heart J; 1988 Oct; 116(4):1155-60. PubMed ID: 3177191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A clinical evaluation of rapid automatic noninvasive blood pressure determination with the Ohmeda 2120 "return-to-flow" method.
    Block FE; Fletcher MV; Morris TJ; Dzwonczyk R
    J Clin Monit; 1991 Jul; 7(3):241-4. PubMed ID: 1890447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 24-hour blood pressure monitoring: evaluation of Spacelabs 5300 monitor by comparison with intra-arterial blood pressure recording in ambulant subjects.
    Casadei R; Parati G; Pomidossi G; Groppelli A; Trazzi S; Di Rienzo M; Mancia G
    J Hypertens; 1988 Oct; 6(10):797-803. PubMed ID: 3198917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-invasive estimates of aortic root pressures: external subclavian arterial pulse tracing calibrated by oscillometrically determined brachial arterial pressures.
    Aakhus S; Torp H; Haugland T; Hatle L
    Clin Physiol; 1993 Nov; 13(6):573-86. PubMed ID: 8119052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Takeda Model UA-751 blood pressure and pulse rate monitor.
    Harrison DW; Crews WD
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1992; 26(4):325-7. PubMed ID: 1393203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An assessment of the Dinamap 845.
    Hutton P; Dye J; Prys-Roberts C
    Anaesthesia; 1984 Mar; 39(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 6703297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the Dinamap continuous blood pressure monitor.
    Manolio TA; Fishel SC; Beattie C; Torres J; Christopherson R; Merritt WT; Whelton PK
    Am J Hypertens; 1988 Jul; 1(3 Pt 3):161S-167S. PubMed ID: 3415794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Reliability of automatic oscillometric monitoring of arterial pressure. Effect of hypotension and arrhythmias].
    Caramella JP; Desmonts JM
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1986 Nov; 79(12):1794-9. PubMed ID: 3105492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prehospital Invasive Arterial Pressure: Use of a Minimized Flush System.
    Karlsson J; Linde J; Svensen C; Gellerfors M
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2018 Oct; 33(5):490-494. PubMed ID: 30168412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of the Colin ABPM 630 at rest and during exercise: an ambulatory blood pressure monitor with gas-powered cuff inflation.
    White WB; Lund-Johansen P; McCabe EJ
    J Hypertens; 1989 Jun; 7(6):477-83. PubMed ID: 2778314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blood pressure measurement in the elderly: correlation of arterial stiffness with difference between intra-arterial and cuff pressures.
    Finnegan TP; Spence JD; Wong DG; Wells GA
    J Hypertens; 1985 Jun; 3(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 4020129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A simple device for the direct measurement of mean arterial pressure and for calibration of arterial pressure monitors.
    Hickey DD
    J Med Eng Technol; 1986; 10(4):188-92. PubMed ID: 3783649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the Colin STBP-680 at rest and during exercise: an automated blood pressure monitor using R-wave gating.
    Bond V; Bassett DR; Howley ET; Lewis J; Walker AJ; Swan PD; Tearney RJ; Adams RG
    Br J Sports Med; 1993 Jun; 27(2):107-9. PubMed ID: 8358579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.