These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
27. Prevalence of conduction delay of the right atrium in patients with SSS: implications for pacing site selection. Verlato R; Zanon F; Bertaglia E; Turrini P; Baccillieri MS; Baracca E; Bongiorni MG; Zampiero A; Zonzin P; Pascotto P; Venturini D; Corbucci G J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2007 Sep; 8(9):706-12. PubMed ID: 17700400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Transesophageal programmed atrial pacing as a method of selecting patients with sick sinus syndrome for permanent atrial pacing. Swiatecka G; Lubiński A; Raczak G; Stanke A; Juzwa A; Kubica J Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1655-61. PubMed ID: 2463528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in patients with impaired sinus node chronotropy: an echocardiographic and cardiopulmonary study. Vardas PE; Simantirakis EN; Parthenakis FI; Chrysostomakis SI; Skalidis EI; Zuridakis EG Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul; 20(7):1762-8. PubMed ID: 9249829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Natural history of sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing in 213 patients: implications for selection of stimulation mode. Brandt J; Anderson H; Fåhraeus T; Schüller H J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Sep; 20(3):633-9. PubMed ID: 1512343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Electrophysiological properties of the left atrium evaluated by coronary sinus pacing in patients with atrial fibrillation. Ishimatsu T; Hayano M; Hirata T; Iliev II; Komiya N; Nakao K; Iwamoto K; Tsukahara K; Sakamoto R; Ueyama C; Yano K Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Dec; 22(12):1739-46. PubMed ID: 10642126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of atrial and VVI pacing modes in symptomatic sinus node dysfunction without associated tachyarrhythmias. Sethi KK; Bajaj V; Mohan JC; Arora R; Khalilullah M Indian Heart J; 1990; 42(3):143-7. PubMed ID: 2258196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Dynamic electrophysiological examination of heart in patients with sick sinus syndrome in continuous pacing]. Iskenderov BG; Tatarchenko IP Ter Arkh; 1998; 70(4):24-7. PubMed ID: 9612897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Comparative evaluation of various methods of continuous electric stimulation of the heart in bradycardia]. Drogaĭtsev AD Kardiologiia; 1990 Feb; 30(2):5-11. PubMed ID: 2348620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing. Hesselson AB; Parsonnet V; Bernstein AD; Bonavita GJ J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Jun; 19(7):1542-9. PubMed ID: 1593051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prospective randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick-sinus syndrome. Andersen HR; Thuesen L; Bagger JP; Vesterlund T; Thomsen PE Lancet; 1994 Dec; 344(8936):1523-8. PubMed ID: 7983951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Complications of permanent cardiac pacing in patients with persistent left superior vena cava. Polewczyk A; Kutarski A; Czekajska-Chehab E; Adamczyk P; Boczar K; Polewczyk M; Janion M Cardiol J; 2014; 21(2):128-37. PubMed ID: 24526508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]