These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3982002)

  • 1. Phoneme feature perception in noise by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Gordon-Salant S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Mar; 28(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 3982002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Carhart Memorial Lecture, American Auditory Society, Salt Lake City, Utah 1996. Phoneme and word recognition for words in isolation and in sentences.
    Olsen WO; Van Tasell DJ; Speaks CE
    Ear Hear; 1997 Jun; 18(3):175-88. PubMed ID: 9201453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of acoustic modification on consonant recognition by elderly hearing-impaired subjects.
    Gordon-Salant S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Apr; 81(4):1199-202. PubMed ID: 3571732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.
    Nishi K; Trevino AC; Rosado Rogers L; García P; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e292-e304. PubMed ID: 28353522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of reducing low-frequency amplification on consonant perception in quiet and noise.
    Gordon-Salant S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Dec; 27(4):483-93. PubMed ID: 6521454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phoneme recognition in modulated maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1646-54. PubMed ID: 22978893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech competition effects on synthetic stop-vowel perception by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Gordon-Salant SM; Wightman FL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 May; 73(5):1756-65. PubMed ID: 6223058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the efficacy of hearing-aid amplification using a phoneme test.
    Scheidiger C; Allen JB; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1739. PubMed ID: 28372055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phonemic confusions in quiet and noise for the hearing-impaired.
    Dreschler WA
    Audiology; 1986; 25(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 3954681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.
    Calandruccio L; Doherty KA; Carney LH; Kikkeri HN
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 17609613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between consonant recognition in noise and hearing threshold.
    Yoon YS; Allen JB; Gooler DM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Apr; 55(2):460-73. PubMed ID: 22199184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consonant-feature transmission as a function of presentation level in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Gutnick HN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Oct; 72(4):1124-30. PubMed ID: 7142577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consonant-recognition patterns and self-assessment of hearing handicap.
    Hustedde CG; Wiley TL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Dec; 34(6):1397-409. PubMed ID: 1787721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.
    Fu QJ; Shannon RV; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Dec; 104(6):3586-96. PubMed ID: 9857517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21. PubMed ID: 1597602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consonant recognition and confusion patterns among elderly hearing-impaired subjects.
    Gordon-Salant S
    Ear Hear; 1987 Oct; 8(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 3678640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.