These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
10. Early and late risk of aortic valve replacement. A 12 year concomitant comparison of the porcine bioprosthetic and tilting disc prosthetic aortic valves. Cohn LH; Allred EN; DiSesa VJ; Sawtelle K; Shemin RJ; Collins JJ J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Nov; 88(5 Pt 1):695-705. PubMed ID: 6492838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement: predictors of adverse outcome. Kuwaki K; Tsukamoto M; Komatsu K; Morishita K; Sakata J; Abe T J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar; 12(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 12701788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes? Alsoufi B; Manlhiot C; McCrindle BW; Canver CC; Sallehuddin A; Al-Oufi S; Joufan M; Al-Halees Z Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 36(1):84-90; discussion 90. PubMed ID: 19369085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Age as a determinant for selection of porcine bioprostheses for cardiac valve replacement: experience with Carpentier-Edwards standard bioprosthesis. Jamieson WR; Tyers GF; Janusz MT; Miyagishima RT; Munro AI; Ling H; Burr LH; Tutassaura H Can J Cardiol; 1991 May; 7(4):181-8. PubMed ID: 2070287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses. Butany J; Yu W; Silver MD; David TE J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves. Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]