These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3983085)
1. [Classification, histological and cytological grading and assessment of regression grading in prostatic carcinomas. A recommendation of the Pathologic-Urological Task Force on Prostatic Carcinoma]. Helpap B; Böcking A; Dhom G; Faul P; Kastendieck H; Leistenschneider W; Müller HA Pathologe; 1985 Jan; 6(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 3983085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Update on the Gleason grading system. Epstein JI Ann Pathol; 2011 Nov; 31(5 Suppl):S20-6. PubMed ID: 22054451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Flow cytometry in prostate cancer. Evaluation of its feasibility for biopsy specimens and correlation with grading]. Ferrara G; Monaco R; Capasso A; Bellomo PF; Fruttero A; Pugno F; Nappi O; Ruà S Pathologica; 1998 Feb; 90(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 9628974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of Gleason system use on different types of prostatic tissue samples. Pleşea IE; Zaharia B; Enache SD; Mitroi G; Tomescu P; Pop OT; Badea P; Kozokić A Rom J Morphol Embryol; 1999-2004; 45():25-34. PubMed ID: 15847376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study between prostatic carcinoma G1-G3 and Gleason grading systems. Zaharia B; Pleşea IE; Enache SD; Tomescu P; Panuş A; Pop OT; Badea P; Kozokić A Rom J Morphol Embryol; 1999-2004; 45():185-97. PubMed ID: 15847394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Classification and grading of prostatic carcinoma. Dhom G Recent Results Cancer Res; 1977; (60):14-26. PubMed ID: 866787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Heterogeneity of nucleolar distribution in prostatic cancer. Comparison with the cytological grade and DNA content]. Piaton E; Bringuier PP; Seigneurin D; Perrin P; Devonec M Bull Cancer; 1991; 78(10):935-41. PubMed ID: 1768939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Reproducibility of malignancy grading in prostatic cancers using the Gleason-Böckling system]. Kiss F; Lakner G; Csellár M; Nagy P; Tóth A; Vittay G Orv Hetil; 1997 May; 138(19):1195-9. PubMed ID: 9235527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparative assessment of the WHO and Gilson histological classifications of prostatic neoplasms (taking into account data of ploidy studies)]. Gundorova LV; Avtandilov GG; Zakhmatov IuM; Varentsov GI; Borshch VIu Urologiia; 2003; (5):9-13. PubMed ID: 14658264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The implications of subjective recognition of malignant cells in aspirations for the grading of prostatic cancer using cell image analysis. Spaander PJ; Ruiter DJ; Hermans J; de Voogt HJ; Brussee JA; Boon ME Anal Quant Cytol; 1982 Jun; 4(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 7051910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma on fine-needle aspiration. Jacobs DM; Vago JF; Weiss MA Diagn Cytopathol; 1989; 5(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 2776596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]