These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3983398)

  • 1. CT densities in delayed iodine hepatic scanning.
    Perkerson RB; Erwin BC; Baumgartner BR; Phillips VM; Torres WE; Clements JL; Gedgaudas-McClees K; Bernardino ME
    Radiology; 1985 May; 155(2):445-6. PubMed ID: 3983398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time-density evaluation of the liver after iosulamide meglumine: a tissue-specific CT contrast agent.
    Marincek B; Young SW; Enzmann DR
    Invest Radiol; 1982; 17(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 7076441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Delayed iodine scanning of the liver: a promising CT technique.
    Phillips VM; Erwin BC; Bernardino ME
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1985; 9(2):415-6. PubMed ID: 3973182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrast enhancement of the liver and blood. Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in the pig.
    Jensen LI; Golman K; Nyman U; Dean PB
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Dec; 20(9):989-94. PubMed ID: 4077451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Value of delayed computed tomography of the liver 4 hours after the administration of meglumine diatrizoate].
    Römer T; Hamm B; Nauert C; Felsenberg D; Wolf KJ
    Rontgenpraxis; 1986 Apr; 39(4):127-30. PubMed ID: 3010479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effective use of low-osmolality contrast media for CT of the liver: evaluation of liver enhancement provided by various doses of iohexol.
    Bree RL; Parisky YR; Bernardino ME; Costello P; Leder R; Brown PC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 8079849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Delayed high iodine dose contrast computed tomography: cranial neoplasms.
    Hayman LA; Evans RA; Hinck VC
    Radiology; 1980 Sep; 136(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 7403546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Size of colorectal liver metastases at abdominal CT: comparison of precontrast and postcontrast studies.
    Nazarian LN; Park JH; Halpern EJ; Parker L; Johnson PT; Lev-Toaff AS; Wechsler RJ
    Radiology; 1999 Dec; 213(3):825-30. PubMed ID: 10580961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intravenous contrast bolus in computed tomography investigation of mass lesion.
    Love L; Malone A; Churchill R; Reynes C; Moncada R; Demos T; Salinas M
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1984; 53(2):57-66. PubMed ID: 6561119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic CT using an arterial bolus.
    Guinto FC; Hashim H; Crofford MJ; Mirfakhraee M
    Radiology; 1985 Nov; 157(2):529-30. PubMed ID: 4048463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gallbladder enhancement following angiography: a normal CT finding.
    Strax R; Toombs BD; Kam J; Rauschkolb EN; Patel S; Sandler CM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1982 Aug; 6(4):766-8. PubMed ID: 7119196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CT evaluation of suspected hepatic metastases: comparison of techniques for i.v. contrast enhancement.
    Paushter DM; Zeman RK; Scheibler ML; Choyke PL; Jaffe MH; Clark LR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Feb; 152(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 2783503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of urographic and cholegraphic contrast enhanced CT liver scanning.
    Stephenson TF; Chang A; Pandya K; Ona F
    Comput Radiol; 1982; 6(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 7172643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrast medium precipitation during abdominal CT.
    Ball DS; Radecki PD; Friedman AC; Caroline DF; Mayer DP
    Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):258-60. PubMed ID: 3940390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrast enhancement in abdominal CT: bolus vs. infusion.
    Burgener FA; Hamlin DJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Aug; 137(2):351-8. PubMed ID: 6789645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of iohexol 300 and diatrizoate meglumine 60 for body CT: image quality, adverse reactions, and aborted/repeated examinations.
    Bernardino ME; Fishman EK; Jeffrey RB; Brown PC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):665-7. PubMed ID: 1739017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Delayed high dose contrast CT: identifying patients at risk of massive hemorrhagic infarction.
    Hayman LA; Evans RA; Bastion FO; Hinck VC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Jun; 136(6):1151-9. PubMed ID: 6786028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of hepatic metastases in breast cancer: the role of nonenhanced and enhanced CT scanning.
    DuBrow RA; David CL; Libshitz HI; Lorigan JG
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1990; 14(3):366-9. PubMed ID: 2335601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pharmacokinetics of low- and high-dose intravenous diatrizoate contrast media administration.
    Feldman S; Hayman LA; Hulse M
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 6706519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Work in progress: serial evaluation of tumor volume using computed tomography and contrast kinetics.
    Oppenheimer DA; Young SW; Marmor JB
    Radiology; 1983 May; 147(2):495-7. PubMed ID: 6836128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.