177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3984879)
1. Importance of the terminal portion of the QRS in the electrocardiographic diagnosis of inferior myocardial infarction.
Warner RA; Battaglia J; Hill NE; Mookherjee S; Smulyan H
Am J Cardiol; 1985 Apr; 55(8):896-9. PubMed ID: 3984879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of combined inferior myocardial infarction and left anterior hemiblock.
Warner RA; Hill NE; Mookherjee S; Smulyan H
Am J Cardiol; 1983 Mar; 51(5):718-22. PubMed ID: 6829429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of inferior myocardial infarction.
Warner R; Hill NE; Sheehe PR; Mookherjee S; Fruehan CT; Smulyan H
Circulation; 1982 Aug; 66(2):422-8. PubMed ID: 7094249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usefulness of abnormalities of repolarization in the electrocardiographic diagnosis of healed myocardial infarction.
Warner RA; Hill NE; Lynch T
J Electrocardiol; 1988; 21 Suppl():S93-7. PubMed ID: 3216181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of optimal scalar electrocardiographic, orthogonal electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic criteria for diagnosing inferior and anterior myocardial infarction.
Hill NE; Warner RA; Mookherjee S; Smulyan H
Am J Cardiol; 1984 Aug; 54(3):274-6. PubMed ID: 6465004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Importance of the distance and velocity of electrical forces in the diagnosis of inferior wall healed myocardial infarction: a vectorcardiographic study.
Warner RA; Hill NE; Rowlandson I; Mookherjee S; Smulyan H
Am J Cardiol; 1986 Apr; 57(10):725-8. PubMed ID: 3962857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. THE Q WAVE IN L III AND AVF OF THE ELECTROCARDIOGRAM. A VECTORCARDIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS WITH THE USE OF THE FRANK SYSTEM.
BENCHIMOL A; ROBERTS MW; DIMOND EG
Calif Med; 1964 Mar; 100(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 14131398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of discrepancies between VCG and ECG interpretation of anterior wall myocardial infarction.
Yamauchi K; Segal M; Tatematsu H; Simonson E
J Electrocardiol; 1977 Apr; 10(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 858977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Discriminant analysis of the standard 12-lead ECG for diagnosing non-Q wave myocardial infarction.
Kornreich F; Selvester RH; Montague TJ; Rautaharju PM; Saetre HA; Ahmad J
J Electrocardiol; 1992; 24 Suppl():163-72. PubMed ID: 1552252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inaccuracy of various proposed electrocardiographic criteria in the diagnosis of apical myocardial infarction--a critical review.
Giannuzzi P; Imparato A; Temporelli PL; Santoro F; Tavazzi L
Eur Heart J; 1989 Oct; 10(10):880-6. PubMed ID: 2598944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New criteria for the diagnosis of healed inferior wall myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle branch block.
Laham CL; Hammill SC; Gibbons RJ
Am J Cardiol; 1997 Jan; 79(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 9024729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of anterior myocardial infarction: importance of the duration of precordial R waves.
Warner RA; Reger M; Hill NE; Mookherjee S; Smulyan H
Am J Cardiol; 1983 Oct; 52(7):690-2. PubMed ID: 6624659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size. VI: Identification of screening criteria for non-acute myocardial infarcts.
Anderson WD; Wagner NB; Lee KL; White RD; Yuschak J; Behar VS; Selvester RH; Ideker RE; Wagner GS
Am J Cardiol; 1988 Apr; 61(10):729-33. PubMed ID: 3354433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy by ECG and VCG in patients with inferior and posterior myocardial infarction. A comparison with echocardiographic data.
Loperfido F; Digaetano A; Guccione P; Desantis F; Vigna C; Laurenzi F; Solfanelli N; Ferrazza A; Pennestri F; Manzoli U
J Electrocardiol; 1986 Jul; 19(3):247-56. PubMed ID: 2943847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Concomitant presence of left anterior hemiblock and inferior myocardial infarction: electrocardiographic recognition of each entity.
Louridas G; Patakas D; Angomachalelis N
J Electrocardiol; 1981 Oct; 14(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 7299306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Specificity of electrocardiographic myocardial infarction screening criteria in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathies.
Shah BR; Lin C; Maynard C; Bart B; Selvester RH; Shaw LK; O'Connor C; Wagner GS
Am Heart J; 1998 Aug; 136(2):314-9. PubMed ID: 9704696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identification of Patients with Myocardial Infarction. Vectorcardiographic and Electrocardiographic Analysis.
Correa R; Arini PD; Correa LS; Valentinuzzi M; Laciar E
Methods Inf Med; 2016 May; 55(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 27063981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic criteria for computer-aided electrocardiographic 15-lead system. Evaluation using 12 leads and Frank orthogonal leads with vector display.
Talbot S; Dreifus LS; Watanabe Y; Chiang R; Morris K; Reich M
Br Heart J; 1976 Dec; 38(12):1247-61. PubMed ID: 137730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic diagnosis of posterior wall myocardial infarction. Significance of the T wave.
Eisenstein I; Sanmarco ME; Madrid WL; Selvester RH
Chest; 1985 Sep; 88(3):409-16. PubMed ID: 4028851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of serial QRS changes during acute inferior myocardial infarction using a QRS scoring system.
Anderson CI; Harrison DG; Stack NC; Hindman NB; Ideker RE; Palmeri ST; Selvester RH; Wagner GS
Am J Cardiol; 1983 Aug; 52(3):252-6. PubMed ID: 6869269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
