These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3986711)

  • 1. Improved recovery of fecal coliforms from the Ottawa River by membrane filters in the presence of food debris.
    Farber JM; Sharpe AN; Kalab M
    Can J Microbiol; 1985 Jan; 31(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 3986711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of coliform source on evaluation of membrane filters.
    Brodsky MH; Schiemann DA
    Appl Microbiol; 1975 Nov; 30(5):727-30. PubMed ID: 1106318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of millipore HA and HC membrane filters for the enumeration of indicator bacteria.
    Lin SD
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1976 Aug; 32(2):300-2. PubMed ID: 788641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the new millipore HC with conventional membrane filters for the enumeration of fecal coliform bacteria.
    Green BL; Clausen E; Litsky W
    Appl Microbiol; 1975 Oct; 30(4):697-9. PubMed ID: 1103735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Gelman and Millipore membrane filters for enumerating fecal coliform bacteria.
    Presswood WG; Brown LR
    Appl Microbiol; 1973 Sep; 26(3):332-6. PubMed ID: 4584578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Determination of fecal coliforms in water using membrane filtration--considerations and modifications of the technic].
    Montacutelli R
    Nuovi Ann Ig Microbiol; 1981; 32(5):327-49. PubMed ID: 7348299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Salmonellae and pollution indicator bacteria in municipal and food processing effluents and the Cornwallis River.
    Menon AS
    Can J Microbiol; 1985 Jul; 31(7):598-603. PubMed ID: 4027779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anaerobic incubation of membrane filter cultures for improved detection of fecal coliforms from recreational waters.
    Doyle JD; Tunnicliff B; Brickler SK; Kramer RE; Sinclair NA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1984 Aug; 48(2):324-6. PubMed ID: 6486780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of methods of enumerating coliforms after UV disinfection.
    Qualls RG; Chang JC; Ossoff SF; Johnson JD
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1984 Oct; 48(4):699-701. PubMed ID: 6508284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of autoclave and ethylene oxide-sterilized membrane filters used in water quality studies.
    Dutka BJ; Jackson MJ; Bell JB
    Appl Microbiol; 1974 Sep; 28(3):474-80. PubMed ID: 4213647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coliform detection in cheese is associated with specific cheese characteristics, but no association was found with pathogen detection.
    Trmčić A; Chauhan K; Kent DJ; Ralyea RD; Martin NH; Boor KJ; Wiedmann M
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Aug; 99(8):6105-6120. PubMed ID: 27289158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the 7-h membrane filter test for quantitation of fecal coliforms in water.
    Barnes R; Curry JI; Elliott LM; Peter CR; Tamplin BR; Wilcke BW
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1989 Jun; 55(6):1504-6. PubMed ID: 2764562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of strains isolated as total and fecal coliforms and comparison of both groups as indicators of fecal pollution in tropical climates.
    Lavoie MC
    Can J Microbiol; 1983 Jun; 29(6):689-93. PubMed ID: 6883225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the surface structure, metal binding, and fecal coliform recoveries of nine membrane filters.
    Tobin RS; Dutka BJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1977 Jul; 34(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 329763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modification of delayed-incubation procedure for detection of fecal coliforms in water.
    Chen M; Hickey PJ
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1983 Oct; 46(4):889-93. PubMed ID: 6639034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variability in the characterization of total coliforms, fecal coliforms and Escherichia coli in recreational water supplies of north Mississippi, USA.
    Fiello M; Mikell AT; Moore MT; Cooper CM
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2014 Aug; 93(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 24952738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative determination of Escherichia coli from coliforms and faecal coliforms in sea water.
    Mates A; Schaffer M
    Microbios; 1992; 71(286):27-32. PubMed ID: 1406342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Suitability of the traditional microbial indicators and their enumerating methods in the assessment of fecal pollution of subtropical freshwater environments.
    Chao KK; Chao CC; Chao WL
    J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2003 Dec; 36(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 14723262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Climate relationships to fecal bacterial densities in Maryland shellfish harvest waters.
    Leight AK; Hood R; Wood R; Brohawn K
    Water Res; 2016 Feb; 89():270-81. PubMed ID: 26689664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of noncoliforms on coliform detection in potable groundwater: improved recovery with an anaerobic membrane filter technique.
    Franzblau SG; Hinnebusch BJ; Kelley LM; Sinclair NA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1984 Jul; 48(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 6383216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.