These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3986898)

  • 21. The simplified formula for the calculation of aortic valve area: potential inaccuracies in patients with bradycardia or tachycardia.
    Hillis LD; Winniford MD
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1987; 13(5):301-3. PubMed ID: 3664627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of various mechanical heart values in the mitral and aortic positions.
    Iwahashi K; Ota T; Okada M; Tsukube T; Matsuda H
    Kobe J Med Sci; 1993 Jun; 39(3):81-93. PubMed ID: 8255076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of aortic regurgitation on the assessment of the pressure half-time and derived mitral-valve area in patients with mitral stenosis.
    Moro E; Nicolosi GL; Zanuttini D; Cervesato E; Roelandt J
    Eur Heart J; 1988 Sep; 9(9):1010-7. PubMed ID: 3229431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Changes in valvular resistance, power dissipation and myocardial reserve with aortic valvuloplasty.
    Feldman T; Ford LE; Chiu YC; Carroll JD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1992 Sep; 1(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 1341224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Importance of the "atrial kick" in determining the effective mitral valve orifice area in mitral stenosis.
    Nicod P; Hillis LD; Winniford MD; Firth BG
    Am J Cardiol; 1986 Feb; 57(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 3946254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Physiological basis of flow dependence of Gorlin formula valve area in aortic stenosis: analysis using an hydraulic model of pulsatile flow.
    Rifkin RD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Nov; 9(6):740-51. PubMed ID: 11128779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Early Diastolic Strain Rate in Relation to Systolic and Diastolic Function and Prognosis in Aortic Stenosis.
    Dahl JS; Barros-Gomes S; Videbæk L; Poulsen MK; Issa IF; Carter-Storch R; Christensen NL; Kumme A; Pellikka PA; Møller JE
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 May; 9(5):519-28. PubMed ID: 27085434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dynamic arm exercise during cardiac catheterization in the assessment of stenotic valvular disease.
    Balady GJ; Jacobs AK; Faxon DP; Ryan TJ
    Clin Cardiol; 1990 Sep; 13(9):632-7. PubMed ID: 2208822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An easy and reproducible parameter for the assessment of the pressure gradient in patients with aortic stenosis disease: A magnetic resonance study.
    Valenti V; Sciarretta S; Levin M; Shubayev L; Edelstein S; Zia MI; Rubattu S; Volpe M; Uretsky S; Wolff SD
    J Cardiol; 2015 May; 65(5):369-76. PubMed ID: 25156165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Percutaneous transvenous mitral balloon valvuloplasty alone in patients with combined aortic and mitral stenosis.
    Lee TM; Su SF; Chen MF; Liau CS; Lee YT
    Angiology; 1997 May; 48(5):445-50. PubMed ID: 9158388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hemodynamic rounds series II: mitral stenosis and pulsus alternans.
    Kern MJ
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1998 Mar; 43(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 9535372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Discordance between mitral valve area (MVA) and pressure gradient in patients with mitral valve stenosis: mean transmitral valve gradient is a severity index or a tolerance index of severity of mitralss valve stenosis?].
    Najih H; Arous S; Laarje A; Baghdadi D; Benouna MG; Azzouzi L; Habbal R
    Pan Afr Med J; 2016; 25():75. PubMed ID: 28292038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Echocardiographic aortic valve area formula for the estimation of obstruction in stenosis.
    Seitz WS; Kashani IA; Lundholm EL
    Jpn Heart J; 1984 Nov; 25(6):947-53. PubMed ID: 6530754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hemodynamic resistance as a measure of functional impairment in aortic valvular stenosis.
    Ford LE; Feldman T; Chiu YC; Carroll JD
    Circ Res; 1990 Jan; 66(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 2295132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Overestimation of valve area by the Gorlin formula.
    Wippermann CF; Schranz D
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Jan; 19(1):234-5. PubMed ID: 1729339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [When is surgery needed for minimally symptomatic or asymptomatic acquired valvulopathy?].
    Acar J; Michel PL; de Gevigney G
    Presse Med; 2000 Nov; 29(34):1867-75. PubMed ID: 11709821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analysis of aortic valve gradients by transseptal technique: implications for noninvasive evaluation.
    Gordon JB; Folland ED
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1989 Jul; 17(3):144-51. PubMed ID: 2766343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Determination of mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis by the flow-convergence-region method during changing hemodynamic conditions.
    Deng YB; Matsumoto M; Munehira J
    Am Heart J; 1996 Sep; 132(3):633-41. PubMed ID: 8800036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hemodynamic differentiation of pathologic and physiologic stenosis in mitral porcine bioprostheses.
    Czer LS; Gray RJ; Bateman TM; DeRobertis MA; Resser K; Chaux A; Matloff JM
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1986 Feb; 7(2):284-94. PubMed ID: 3944346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Simplified method for calculating aortic valve resistance: correlation with valve area and standard formula.
    Kegel JG; Schalet BD; Corin WJ; Iskandrian AS
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1993 Sep; 30(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 8402857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.