154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3986994)
1. Better laboratory evaluations of instruments and kits are required.
Fraser CG; Singer R
Clin Chem; 1985 May; 31(5):667-70. PubMed ID: 3986994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Verification, validation and evaluation of analytical procedures in laboratory medicine.
Haeckel R
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004 Jan; 42(1):111-2. PubMed ID: 15061393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Guide to the expression of uncertainty of measurement: point/counterpoint.
Lequin RM
Clin Chem; 2004 May; 50(5):977-8. PubMed ID: 15105367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [From the Point of View of the Production of Reference Material].
Kuwa K
Rinsho Byori; 2014 Sep; 62(9):895-907. PubMed ID: 27526536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modification of In Vitro Diagnostic Devices: Leveling the Playing Field.
Rychert J; Delgado JC; Genzen JR
Clin Chem; 2020 Jun; 66(6):760-762. PubMed ID: 32278318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. C-Path sets diagnostics standard.
Roberts J
Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Mar; 27(3):213. PubMed ID: 19270654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC). Scientific Committee, Analytical Section. IFCC/WHO principles and recommendations on evaluation of diagnostic reagent sets used in health laboratories with limited resources. Part 3. Selection and evaluation using reference materials. General considerations.
Logan JE; Bayse DD; Koedam JC; Mather A; Wilding P
J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1984 Aug; 22(8):573-82. PubMed ID: 6491619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of kits for the determination of creatine kinase activity in serum.
Canalias F; Saco Y; Gella FJ
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1995 Aug; 33(8):535-9. PubMed ID: 8547439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selection, validation, standardization, and performance of a designated comparison method for HDL-cholesterol for use in the cholesterol reference method laboratory network.
Kimberly MM; Leary ET; Cole TG; Waymack PP
Clin Chem; 1999 Oct; 45(10):1803-12. PubMed ID: 10508128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Total error evaluation of Roche direct HDL-cholesterol reagent and calibrator across 31 lot combinations: a 2-year experience.
Cobbaert CM; Luderer TK
Clin Chem; 2000 Jan; 46(1):133-4. PubMed ID: 10620588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical laboratory's trends in the 21st century].
Kanno T
Rinsho Byori; 2001 Nov; 49(11):1110-4. PubMed ID: 11769556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finding control in quality control of unit-use prothrombin time tests.
Pontius CA
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2001 May; 33(5):38-40, 42. PubMed ID: 11373813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [External evaluation of quality of cytological studies in laboratories in Russia].
Shabalova IP
Klin Lab Diagn; 2002 Apr; (4):51-3. PubMed ID: 12412511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A recommended scheme for the evaluation of kits in the clinical laboratory.
Percy-Robb IW; Broughton PM; Jennings RD; McCormack JJ; Neill DW; Saunders RA; Warner M
Ann Clin Biochem; 1980 Sep; 17(5):217-26. PubMed ID: 7447355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry, Scientific Committee, Analytical Section: evaluation of performance of diagnostic reagent sets used in health laboratories with limited resources. Appendix A: Glucose.
Logan JE; Bayse DD; Koedam JC; Mather A; Wilding P
J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1984 Nov; 22(11):827-44. PubMed ID: 6527100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Critique of the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement method of estimating and reporting uncertainty in diagnostic assays.
Krouwer JS
Clin Chem; 2003 Nov; 49(11):1818-21. PubMed ID: 14578312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro medical devices: how businesses can successfully comply with the new European regulation.
Moan B; Rabin N
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2018 Dec; 76(6):716-718. PubMed ID: 30270823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monitoring laboratory data across manufacturers and laboratories--A prerequisite to make "Big Data" work.
Goossens K; Van Uytfanghe K; Twomey PJ; Thienpont LM;
Clin Chim Acta; 2015 May; 445():12-8. PubMed ID: 25771106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Revised recommendation (1983) on evaluation of diagnostic kits. Part 2. Guidelines for the evaluation of clinical chemistry kits.
Logan JE
J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1983 Dec; 21(12):899-902. PubMed ID: 6663250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Procedure for accurate evaluation of laboratory data and its international trends].
Kuwa K
Rinsho Byori; 2005 Jun; 53(6):531-9. PubMed ID: 16026081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
